vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ingevity Corp (NGVT) and Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REXR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($245.1M vs $185.4M, roughly 1.3× Ingevity Corp). Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.5% vs -45.6%, a 46.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ingevity Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (36.7% vs -2.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (1.6% CAGR vs -26.2%).
Ingevity Corp is a global specialty chemicals and advanced materials manufacturer. It produces high-performance carbon materials, pavement preservation solutions, and specialty chemicals, serving automotive emissions control, industrial purification, road infrastructure, and agricultural input markets across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.
Genpact Ltd. is an American information technology services, consulting, and outsourcing company headquartered in New York City, New York. Founded in Gurgaon, India, and legally domiciled in Bermuda, Genpact employs more than 125,000 people and provides services to clients in over 30 countries worldwide. Genpact is listed on the NYSE and generated revenues of US$4.48 billion in 2023.
NGVT vs REXR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $185.4M | $245.1M |
| Net Profit | $-84.6M | $1.2M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -47.7% | 41.0% |
| Net Margin | -45.6% | 0.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 36.7% | -2.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -609.6% | 27.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.33 | $0.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $245.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $185.4M | $248.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $333.1M | $253.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $365.1M | $249.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $284.0M | $252.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.6M | $242.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $333.8M | $241.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $390.6M | $237.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-84.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.5M | $89.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-146.5M | $116.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.5M | $71.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.6M | $64.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-107.2M | $67.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-283.7M | $82.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 37.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 81.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -47.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -39.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -45.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.1% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -40.1% | 46.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | 28.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.2% | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -32.1% | 28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -72.6% | 34.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.33 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.02 | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.44 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.94 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.81 | $0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $78.1M | $51.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $29.7M | $8.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $12.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 39.10× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $51.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $78.1M | $165.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.4M | $249.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $76.9M | $431.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.5M | $504.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.0M | $56.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.5M | $61.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.4M | $125.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $8.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.7M | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.1M | $8.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.7M | $8.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $234.6M | $8.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $195.2M | $8.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $214.5M | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $284.8M | $8.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $12.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $12.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $12.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $13.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $13.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $12.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $12.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $12.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 39.10× | 0.38× | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.39× | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.24× | 0.38× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.68× | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.86× | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.52× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.92× | 0.42× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $97.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $73.5M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 39.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $273.5M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $97.1M | $542.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $129.7M | $149.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.0M | $128.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4M | $152.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.5M | $478.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.5M | $127.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.7M | $101.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $73.5M | $208.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $117.8M | $60.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $66.8M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $73.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $39.6M | $105.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.5M | $7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.6M | $16.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 39.6% | 84.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.4% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.3% | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.4% | 29.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.2% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.5% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 7.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.7% | 134.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | 31.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.4% | 153.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.4% | 49.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 35.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.98× | 1.66× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.24× | 2.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.89× | 7.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.23× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NGVT
| Performance Materials | $151.2M | 82% |
| Advanced Polymer Technologies Segment | $36.5M | 20% |
REXR
Segment breakdown not available.
