vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NICE Ltd. (NICE) and RANGE RESOURCES CORP (RRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NICE Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $786.9M, roughly 1.7× RANGE RESOURCES CORP). RANGE RESOURCES CORP runs the higher net margin — 22.8% vs 16.8%, a 6.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
NiCE is an American technology company specializing in customer relations management software, artificial intelligence, and digital and workforce engagement management.
Range Resources Corporation is a natural gas exploration and production company, the headquartered is in Fort Worth, Texas. It operates in the Marcellus Formation, where it is the largest land owners.
NICE vs RRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $786.9M |
| Net Profit | $222.2M | $179.1M |
| Gross Margin | 66.2% | 94.5% |
| Operating Margin | 18.9% | — |
| Net Margin | 16.8% | 22.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 18.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 88.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $786.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $655.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $699.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $846.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $667.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $567.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $513.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $598.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $179.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $144.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $222.2M | $237.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $97.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $94.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $50.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $164.3M | $28.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $92.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 94.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 92.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 66.2% | 95.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 93.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 93.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 94.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 67.4% | 93.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 94.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 22.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.2% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.60 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $481.7M | $204.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6B | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | $5.3B | $7.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.28× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $204.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $175.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $481.7M | $134.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $344.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $304.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $277.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $511.8M | $251.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $343.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $424.2M | $257.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $407.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 30.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.91× | 1.44× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $257.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $247.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $424.2M | $336.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $330.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $217.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $245.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $260.3M | $148.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $331.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $407.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $242.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.91× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.85× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.58× | 5.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NICE
| Cloud | $950.1M | 72% |
| Services | $296.5M | 22% |
| Product | $77.1M | 6% |
RRC
| Natural Gas Natural Gas Liquids And Oil Sales | $745.5M | 95% |
| Brokered Natural Gas And Marketing | $41.3M | 5% |
