vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) and SentinelOne, Inc. (S). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

SentinelOne, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($258.9M vs $132.2M, roughly 2.0× Nine Energy Service, Inc.). Nine Energy Service, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -14.5% vs -23.3%, a 8.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SentinelOne, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.9% vs -6.5%). SentinelOne, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($20.9M vs $-4.8M).

Xcel Energy Inc. is a U.S. regulated electric utility and natural gas delivery company based in Minneapolis, Minnesota, serving approximately 3.9 million electricity customers and 2.2 million natural gas customers across parts of eight states as of mid-2025. It consists of four operating subsidiaries: Northern States Power-Minnesota, Northern States Power-Wisconsin, Public Service Company of Colorado, and Southwestern Public Service Co.

SentinelOne, Inc. is an American cybersecurity company listed on NYSE based in Mountain View, California. The company was founded in 2013 by Tomer Weingarten, Almog Cohen and Ehud ("Udi") Shamir. Weingarten acts as the company's CEO. The company has approximately 2,800 employees and offices in Mountain View, Boston, Prague, Tokyo, and Tel Aviv. The company uses machine learning for monitoring personal computers, IoT devices, and cloud workloads. The company's platform utilizes a heuristic mod...

NINE vs S — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
S
S
2.0× larger
S
$258.9M
$132.2M
NINE
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
S
S
+29.5% gap
S
22.9%
-6.5%
NINE
Higher net margin
NINE
NINE
8.7% more per $
NINE
-14.5%
-23.3%
S
More free cash flow
S
S
$25.7M more FCF
S
$20.9M
$-4.8M
NINE

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
NINE
NINE
S
S
Revenue
$132.2M
$258.9M
Net Profit
$-19.2M
$-60.3M
Gross Margin
73.8%
Operating Margin
-4.2%
-28.3%
Net Margin
-14.5%
-23.3%
Revenue YoY
-6.5%
22.9%
Net Profit YoY
-117.4%
23.1%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.47
$-0.18

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
NINE
NINE
S
S
Q4 25
$132.2M
$258.9M
Q3 25
$132.0M
$242.2M
Q2 25
$147.3M
$229.0M
Q1 25
$150.5M
Q4 24
$141.4M
Q3 24
$138.2M
Q2 24
$132.4M
Q1 24
$142.1M
Net Profit
NINE
NINE
S
S
Q4 25
$-19.2M
$-60.3M
Q3 25
$-14.6M
$-72.0M
Q2 25
$-10.4M
$-208.2M
Q1 25
$-7.1M
Q4 24
$-8.8M
Q3 24
$-10.1M
Q2 24
$-14.0M
Q1 24
$-8.1M
Gross Margin
NINE
NINE
S
S
Q4 25
73.8%
Q3 25
75.0%
Q2 25
75.3%
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
Operating Margin
NINE
NINE
S
S
Q4 25
-4.2%
-28.3%
Q3 25
-0.9%
-33.3%
Q2 25
2.3%
-38.2%
Q1 25
3.7%
Q4 24
2.5%
Q3 24
1.8%
Q2 24
-1.1%
Q1 24
3.1%
Net Margin
NINE
NINE
S
S
Q4 25
-14.5%
-23.3%
Q3 25
-11.1%
-29.7%
Q2 25
-7.1%
-90.9%
Q1 25
-4.7%
Q4 24
-6.3%
Q3 24
-7.3%
Q2 24
-10.6%
Q1 24
-5.7%
EPS (diluted)
NINE
NINE
S
S
Q4 25
$-0.47
$-0.18
Q3 25
$-0.35
$-0.22
Q2 25
$-0.25
$-0.63
Q1 25
$-0.18
Q4 24
$-0.21
Q3 24
$-0.26
Q2 24
$-0.40
Q1 24
$-0.24

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
NINE
NINE
S
S
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$18.4M
$649.8M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$-115.0M
$1.5B
Total Assets
$339.5M
$2.4B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
NINE
NINE
S
S
Q4 25
$18.4M
$649.8M
Q3 25
$14.4M
$810.8M
Q2 25
$14.2M
$766.9M
Q1 25
$17.3M
Q4 24
$27.9M
Q3 24
$15.7M
Q2 24
$26.0M
Q1 24
$10.2M
Stockholders' Equity
NINE
NINE
S
S
Q4 25
$-115.0M
$1.5B
Q3 25
$-95.9M
$1.5B
Q2 25
$-81.7M
$1.5B
Q1 25
$-72.1M
Q4 24
$-66.1M
Q3 24
$-57.6M
Q2 24
$-49.7M
Q1 24
$-43.3M
Total Assets
NINE
NINE
S
S
Q4 25
$339.5M
$2.4B
Q3 25
$340.7M
$2.4B
Q2 25
$361.2M
$2.4B
Q1 25
$359.2M
Q4 24
$360.1M
Q3 24
$353.2M
Q2 24
$381.7M
Q1 24
$380.4M

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
NINE
NINE
S
S
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-2.2M
$21.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-4.8M
$20.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-3.6%
8.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.0%
0.0%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-23.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
NINE
NINE
S
S
Q4 25
$-2.2M
$21.0M
Q3 25
$-9.9M
$-1.0M
Q2 25
$10.1M
$52.3M
Q1 25
$-5.3M
Q4 24
$15.0M
Q3 24
$-5.8M
Q2 24
$12.9M
Q1 24
$-8.8M
Free Cash Flow
NINE
NINE
S
S
Q4 25
$-4.8M
$20.9M
Q3 25
$-13.4M
$-1.3M
Q2 25
$4.2M
$52.1M
Q1 25
$-9.3M
Q4 24
$11.8M
Q3 24
$-9.3M
Q2 24
$10.3M
Q1 24
$-14.3M
FCF Margin
NINE
NINE
S
S
Q4 25
-3.6%
8.1%
Q3 25
-10.2%
-0.5%
Q2 25
2.9%
22.8%
Q1 25
-6.2%
Q4 24
8.3%
Q3 24
-6.7%
Q2 24
7.7%
Q1 24
-10.1%
Capex Intensity
NINE
NINE
S
S
Q4 25
2.0%
0.0%
Q3 25
2.6%
0.1%
Q2 25
4.0%
0.1%
Q1 25
2.6%
Q4 24
2.3%
Q3 24
2.5%
Q2 24
2.0%
Q1 24
3.9%

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

NINE
NINE

Cement$52.6M40%
Tool Revenue$28.6M22%
Coiled Tubing$25.8M20%
Wireline$25.1M19%

S
S

US$154.8M60%
Non Us$104.1M40%

Related Comparisons