vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) and VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. (VRTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($199.5M vs $132.2M, roughly 1.5× Nine Energy Service, Inc.). VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 3.6% vs -14.5%, a 18.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.1% vs -6.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Nine Energy Service, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-3.6% CAGR vs -5.7%).
Xcel Energy Inc. is a U.S. regulated electric utility and natural gas delivery company based in Minneapolis, Minnesota, serving approximately 3.9 million electricity customers and 2.2 million natural gas customers across parts of eight states as of mid-2025. It consists of four operating subsidiaries: Northern States Power-Minnesota, Northern States Power-Wisconsin, Public Service Company of Colorado, and Southwestern Public Service Co.
VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC.VRTSEarnings & Financial Report
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is an American company which operates as a multi-manager asset management business, comprising a number of individual affiliated managers, each having its own investment process and brand, and the services of unaffiliated sub advisers.
NINE vs VRTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $132.2M | $199.5M |
| Net Profit | $-19.2M | $7.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -4.2% | 7.7% |
| Net Margin | -14.5% | 3.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -6.5% | -4.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -117.4% | -78.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.47 | $1.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $199.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $132.2M | $208.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.0M | $216.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $147.3M | $210.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.5M | $217.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $141.4M | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.2M | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $132.4M | $224.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-19.2M | $33.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.6M | $31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.4M | $42.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.1M | $28.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-8.8M | $39.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-10.1M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.0M | $26.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.2% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.3% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.7% | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.5% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.1% | 19.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -14.5% | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.1% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.1% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.7% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.3% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.3% | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.6% | 11.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.05 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.47 | $5.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.35 | $4.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.25 | $6.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.18 | $4.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.21 | $4.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | $5.71 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.40 | $2.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $18.4M | $136.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-115.0M | $93.6B |
| Total Assets | $339.5M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $136.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $390.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $231.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $231.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $232.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $237.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $247.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $93.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-115.0M | $934.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-95.9M | $918.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-81.7M | $896.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-72.1M | $893.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-66.1M | $897.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-57.6M | $889.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-49.7M | $868.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $339.5M | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $340.7M | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $361.2M | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $359.2M | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $360.1M | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $353.2M | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $381.7M | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.29× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-2.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-23.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.2M | $-67.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.9M | $108.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1M | $75.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.0M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.8M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.9M | $70.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | $-74.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.4M | $106.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | $74.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.3M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.3M | $68.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.3M | $68.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.6% | -35.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.2% | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.2% | -3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.7% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.7% | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.3% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.0% | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -1.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.69× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NINE
| Cement | $52.6M | 40% |
| Tool Revenue | $28.6M | 22% |
| Coiled Tubing | $25.8M | 20% |
| Wireline | $25.1M | 19% |
VRTS
| Investment management fees | $169.1M | 85% |
| Administration and shareholder service fees | $17.3M | 9% |
| Distribution and service fees | $11.6M | 6% |
