vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NEW JERSEY RESOURCES CORP (NJR) and Snap-on (SNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Snap-on is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.2B vs $939.4M, roughly 1.3× NEW JERSEY RESOURCES CORP). NEW JERSEY RESOURCES CORP runs the higher net margin — 23.3% vs 21.3%, a 2.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Snap-on posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.7% vs -33.0%). Over the past eight quarters, NEW JERSEY RESOURCES CORP's revenue compounded faster (111.6% CAGR vs 2.0%).
New Jersey Resources is an energy services holding company based in Wall Township, New Jersey. It is a Fortune 1000 company, and a member of the Forbes Platinum 400. New Jersey Natural Gas is its principal subsidiary.
Snap-on Incorporated is an American designer, manufacturer, and marketer of high-end tools and equipment for professional use in the transportation industry, including the automotive, heavy duty, equipment, marine, aviation, and railroad industries. Headquartered in Kenosha, Wisconsin, since 1930, Snap-on also distributes lower-end tools under the brand name Blue-Point. Their primary competitors include Matco, Mac Tools, and Cornwell Tools.
NJR vs SNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $939.4M | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $218.9M | $260.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 32.0% | 27.8% |
| Net Margin | 23.3% | 21.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -33.0% | 2.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.2% | 1.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.16 | $4.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $939.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $440.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $188.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $569.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $359.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $265.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $209.9M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | $218.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $122.5M | $260.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.1M | $265.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.1M | $250.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $204.3M | $240.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $131.3M | $258.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.1M | $251.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-11.6M | $271.2M |
| Q1 26 | 32.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.6% | 27.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.5% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.2% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.8% | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.0% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 29.9% |
| Q1 26 | 23.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.8% | 21.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.0% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.4% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.9% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.6% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.3% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.5% | 23.1% |
| Q1 26 | $2.16 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.21 | $4.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $5.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.15 | $4.72 | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.02 | $4.51 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.31 | $4.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.91 | $4.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $5.07 |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $268.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $254.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 20.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $26.7M | $268.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.2M | $277.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.9M | $237.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $423.0M | $298.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.0M | $293.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.5M | $274.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.3M | $301.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $254.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $258.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $217.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $275.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $277.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.22× | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.39× | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.07× | 1.24× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.07× | 1.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.71× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.11× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NJR
| Utility | $640.9M | 68% |
| Nonutility | $298.5M | 32% |
SNA
Segment breakdown not available.
