vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NEW JERSEY RESOURCES CORP (NJR) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NEW JERSEY RESOURCES CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($939.4M vs $425.3M, roughly 2.2× Verisign). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs 23.3%, a 25.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Verisign posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.6% vs -33.0%). Over the past eight quarters, NEW JERSEY RESOURCES CORP's revenue compounded faster (111.6% CAGR vs 5.2%).
New Jersey Resources is an energy services holding company based in Wall Township, New Jersey. It is a Fortune 1000 company, and a member of the Forbes Platinum 400. New Jersey Natural Gas is its principal subsidiary.
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
NJR vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $939.4M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $218.9M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | 32.0% | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | 23.3% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -33.0% | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 7.2% | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.16 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $939.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $440.9M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $188.3M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.8M | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $569.2M | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $359.0M | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $265.7M | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $209.9M | $387.1M |
| Q1 26 | $218.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $122.5M | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.1M | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.1M | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $204.3M | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $131.3M | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.1M | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-11.6M | $198.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 87.8% |
| Q1 26 | 32.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.6% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.5% | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.5% | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.2% | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 52.8% | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.0% | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 68.8% |
| Q1 26 | 23.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.8% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.0% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.4% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.9% | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.6% | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.3% | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.5% | 51.4% |
| Q1 26 | $2.16 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.21 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.02 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.31 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.91 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | — | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $591.0K | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $931.0K | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.7M | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9M | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0M | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.4M | $689.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $-1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.32× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.20× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.30× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $26.7M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.2M | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.9M | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $423.0M | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.0M | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.5M | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.3M | $160.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $151.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.22× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.39× | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.07× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.07× | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.71× | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.81× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NJR
| Utility | $640.9M | 68% |
| Nonutility | $298.5M | 32% |
VRSN
Segment breakdown not available.