vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) and OFF THE HOOK YS INC. (OTH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Net Lease Office Properties is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.7M vs $24.0M, roughly 1.3× OFF THE HOOK YS INC.). Net Lease Office Properties runs the higher net margin — -0.2% vs -0.3%, a 0.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Net Lease Office Properties is a real estate investment entity focused on acquiring, owning, and operating high-quality single-tenant net lease office assets, primarily located across the United States. It delivers stable, long-term income streams to investors through its curated portfolio of commercial real estate holdings.
NLOP vs OTH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.7M | $24.0M |
| Net Profit | $-53.0K | $-66.7K |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.6% |
| Operating Margin | -0.2% | 1.3% |
| Net Margin | -0.2% | -0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 99.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $-0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $30.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.8M | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-53.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-64.2M | $-66.7K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-81.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $492.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-35.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-40.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-27.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -215.2% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -279.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -140.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -126.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -62.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -215.4% | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -279.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -129.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -128.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -63.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.33 | $-0.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.50 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.41 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.73 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.84 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.88 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $119.6M | $2.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $21.9M | $287.2K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $293.9M | $-610.5K |
| Total Assets | $453.4M | $32.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.07× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $119.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.7M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $21.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.1M | $287.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | $117.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $169.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $327.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $515.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $293.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $430.3M | $-610.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $500.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $582.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $581.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $621.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $660.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $647.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $453.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $522.6M | $32.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $668.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $784.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $805.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $919.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.80× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $64.1M | $-664.2K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-867.2K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -3.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $64.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.3M | $-664.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-867.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.70× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
