vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) and AVITA Medical, Inc. (RCEL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Net Lease Office Properties is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($30.7M vs $17.6M, roughly 1.7× AVITA Medical, Inc.). Net Lease Office Properties runs the higher net margin — -0.2% vs -66.0%, a 65.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Net Lease Office Properties posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.9% vs -4.3%). Over the past eight quarters, AVITA Medical, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (26.0% CAGR vs -16.4%).
Net Lease Office Properties is a real estate investment entity focused on acquiring, owning, and operating high-quality single-tenant net lease office assets, primarily located across the United States. It delivers stable, long-term income streams to investors through its curated portfolio of commercial real estate holdings.
Avita Medical is a clinical and commercial company developing and marketing a range regenerative medicine products. The first regenerative medicine product brought to the market by Avita Medical was ReCell spray-on skin for the treatment of burns. The two latest products are ReNovaCell, for Aesthetics and Plastic applications including skin trauma, and ReGenerCell for the treatment of chronic wounds. The Avita Medical regenerative product range is currently marketed in Europe, the Middle East...
NLOP vs RCEL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.7M | $17.6M |
| Net Profit | $-53.0K | $-11.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 81.2% |
| Operating Margin | -0.2% | -59.1% |
| Net Margin | -0.2% | -66.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.9% | -4.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 99.9% | -0.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $-0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $30.7M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.8M | $17.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.2M | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.2M | $18.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.7M | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.5M | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.0M | $15.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.0M | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-53.0K | $-11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-64.2M | $-13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-81.5M | $-9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $492.0K | $-13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-35.8M | $-11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-40.3M | $-16.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.5M | $-15.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-27.8M | $-18.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 81.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 81.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 84.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 87.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 83.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 86.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 86.4% |
| Q4 25 | -0.2% | -59.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -215.2% | -53.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -279.1% | -60.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | -63.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -140.7% | -54.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -126.4% | -70.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.3% | -102.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -62.7% | -155.0% |
| Q4 25 | -0.2% | -66.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -215.4% | -77.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -279.5% | -53.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | -74.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -129.0% | -63.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -128.0% | -82.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.9% | -101.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -63.3% | -168.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.33 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.50 | $-0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.41 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.73 | $-0.62 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.84 | $-0.60 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.88 | $-0.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $119.6M | $18.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $21.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $293.9M | $-16.6M |
| Total Assets | $453.4M | $56.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.07× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $119.6M | $18.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.7M | $23.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.1M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.2M | $25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.1M | $35.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.1M | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $54.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.8M | $68.2M |
| Q4 25 | $21.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $117.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $169.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $327.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $515.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $293.9M | $-16.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $430.3M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $500.0M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $582.1M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $581.2M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $621.9M | $12.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $660.3M | $23.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $647.2M | $32.6M |
| Q4 25 | $453.4M | $56.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $522.6M | $63.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $668.7M | $58.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $784.1M | $69.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $805.1M | $79.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $919.9M | $81.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $87.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $97.4M |
| Q4 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.80× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $64.1M | $-5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-6.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -34.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-33.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $64.1M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.3M | $-5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.7M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.1M | $-10.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.9M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.3M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.4M | $-20.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-6.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-10.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-15.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-22.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | -34.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -36.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -58.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -56.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -52.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -56.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -101.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -198.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.70× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
