vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) and SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.4M vs $30.7M, roughly 1.3× Net Lease Office Properties). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC runs the higher net margin — 54.9% vs -0.2%, a 55.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Net Lease Office Properties posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (10.9% vs 1.1%). Over the past eight quarters, SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC's revenue compounded faster (14.1% CAGR vs -16.4%).
Net Lease Office Properties is a real estate investment entity focused on acquiring, owning, and operating high-quality single-tenant net lease office assets, primarily located across the United States. It delivers stable, long-term income streams to investors through its curated portfolio of commercial real estate holdings.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
NLOP vs SD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.7M | $39.4M |
| Net Profit | $-53.0K | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.2% | 38.5% |
| Net Margin | -0.2% | 54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 10.9% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 99.9% | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $30.7M | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.8M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.2M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.2M | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.7M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.5M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.0M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.0M | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-53.0K | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-64.2M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-81.5M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $492.0K | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-35.8M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-40.3M | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.5M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-27.8M | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | -0.2% | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -215.2% | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -279.1% | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -140.7% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -126.4% | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.3% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -62.7% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | -0.2% | 54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -215.4% | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -279.5% | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -129.0% | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -128.0% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.9% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -63.3% | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.33 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.50 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.41 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.73 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.84 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.88 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $119.6M | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $21.9M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $293.9M | $510.9M |
| Total Assets | $453.4M | $644.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.07× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $119.6M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.7M | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.1M | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.2M | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.1M | $98.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.1M | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.8M | $207.0M |
| Q4 25 | $21.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $117.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $148.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $169.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $239.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $327.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $515.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $293.9M | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $430.3M | $492.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $500.0M | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $582.1M | $464.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $581.2M | $460.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $621.9M | $446.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $660.3M | $424.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $647.2M | $419.7M |
| Q4 25 | $453.4M | $644.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $522.6M | $619.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $668.7M | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $784.1M | $588.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $805.1M | $581.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $919.9M | $565.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $529.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $527.4M |
| Q4 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.11× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.23× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.80× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $64.1M | $31.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 43.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $41.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $64.1M | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.3M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.7M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.1M | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.9M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.3M | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $26.4M | $15.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.70× | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.18× | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NLOP
Segment breakdown not available.
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |
