vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NMI Holdings, Inc. (NMIH) and Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NMI Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($183.5M vs $143.3M, roughly 1.3× Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.). NMI Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 54.1% vs -31.4%, a 85.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NMI Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.9% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, NMI Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (6.4% CAGR vs 0.0%).
NMI Holdings, Inc. is a leading U.S.-headquartered private mortgage insurance provider. It offers mortgage guarantee insurance solutions to lending institutions to mitigate credit risks associated with residential home loans, primarily serving the U.S. domestic housing market, supporting accessible homeownership for qualified borrowers while shielding lenders from default-related losses.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
NMIH vs PDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $183.5M | $143.3M |
| Net Profit | $99.3M | $-45.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — |
| Net Margin | 54.1% | -31.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.9% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.28 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $183.5M | $143.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $180.7M | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $178.7M | $139.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $173.8M | $140.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $173.2M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.5M | $143.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $166.1M | $139.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.1M | $143.3M |
| Q1 26 | $99.3M | $-45.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $94.2M | $-43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.2M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.6M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.2M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.8M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $92.1M | $-9.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 67.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 69.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 71.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 66.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 71.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 73.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 54.1% | -31.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 52.1% | -30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 53.7% | -9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.3% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.2% | -7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.8% | -20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.9% | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 56.8% | -6.8% |
| Q1 26 | $1.28 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.21 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.22 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.21 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.28 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.07 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.15 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.13 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $70.7M | $2.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.6B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $3.9B | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $70.7M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $731.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $109.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $138.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | $2.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $3.9B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
