vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM) and PicoCELA Inc. (PCLA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($327.6M vs $252.6M, roughly 1.3× PicoCELA Inc.). Navios Maritime Partners L.P. runs the higher net margin — 21.4% vs -125.2%, a 146.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. is a multinational, vertically integrated seaborne shipping and logistics company focused on the transport and transshipment of drybulk commodities including iron ore, coal and grain.
PicoCELA Inc. is a global technology company specializing in low-power, high-reliability wireless connectivity solutions, including Wi-Fi HaLow modules and edge network infrastructure. It caters to industrial IoT, smart city, retail, and smart home segments, with a primary operational footprint across Asia, North America, and European markets.
NMM vs PCLA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $327.6M | $252.6M |
| Net Profit | $69.9M | $-316.2M |
| Gross Margin | 90.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -114.8% |
| Net Margin | 21.4% | -125.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -31.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | $327.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $252.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $342.2M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $346.9M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $280.7M | — |
| Q2 25 | $69.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-316.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $101.5M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $112.3M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $118.2M | — |
| Q2 25 | 90.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 88.3% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 87.9% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 92.3% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -114.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | 21.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -125.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.7% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 32.4% | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 42.1% | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $377.0M | $456.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.0B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $354.8M |
| Total Assets | $5.9B | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | $377.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $456.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $272.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $261.4M | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $163.4M | — |
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $1.1B | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $354.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $2.0B | — |
| Q2 25 | $5.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q2 22 | $3.7B | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 22 | 0.54× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-245.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-256.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -101.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 4.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-245.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-256.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -101.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NMM
Segment breakdown not available.
PCLA
| Revenue from product | $179.1M | 71% |
| Revenue from SaaS, Maintenance and others | $42.4M | 17% |
| Revenue from product – related party | $31.0M | 12% |
