vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and NPK International Inc. (NPKI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NPK International Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($75.2M vs $57.8M, roughly 1.3× Nano Dimension Ltd.). NPK International Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($5.8M vs $-21.1M).
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
NNDM vs NPKI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $57.8M | $75.2M |
| Net Profit | $-98.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | 43.1% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | -155.1% | 16.7% |
| Net Margin | -171.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | 30.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.45 | $0.17 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $75.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $68.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $68.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $64.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $57.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $44.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.4M | $66.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $49.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-98.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-174.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.1% | 39.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 36.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -155.1% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -171.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -394.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -279.4% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.45 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.99 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.35 | $0.09 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $317.2M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $16.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $860.0M | $351.2M |
| Total Assets | $902.5M | $441.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.05× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $35.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $317.2M | $17.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $42.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.8M | $35.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $37.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $16.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $77.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $351.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $333.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $328.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $326.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $860.0M | $326.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $316.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $870.3M | $426.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $421.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $441.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $404.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $393.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $390.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $902.5M | $393.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $389.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $911.0M | $624.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $640.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.18× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.9M | $18.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-21.1M | $5.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -36.5% | 7.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 16.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $26.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $18.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $21.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.7M | $27.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.1M | $-17.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.5% | -30.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 31.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.37× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.43× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.64× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NNDM
Segment breakdown not available.
NPKI
| Rental Revenue | $34.8M | 46% |
| Products | $25.5M | 34% |
| Services | $14.9M | 20% |