vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and Orchid Island Capital, Inc. (ORC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($57.8M vs $38.5M, roughly 1.5× Orchid Island Capital, Inc.). Orchid Island Capital, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 268.7% vs -171.1%, a 439.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
Orchid Island Capital, Inc. is a U.S.-based specialty finance company operating as a real estate investment trust. It primarily invests in residential mortgage-backed securities, including agency and non-agency products, targeting consistent risk-adjusted returns for its investors across U.S. fixed income markets.
NNDM vs ORC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $57.8M | $38.5M |
| Net Profit | $-98.8M | $103.4M |
| Gross Margin | 43.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -155.1% | — |
| Net Margin | -171.1% | 268.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 372.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 1764.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.45 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $38.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $26.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $340.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.4M | $-697.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $103.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $72.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-33.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $17.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-98.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $19.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -155.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 268.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 267.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -145.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 86.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -171.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5094.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -279.4% | 714.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -794.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.45 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.35 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $317.2M | $665.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $860.0M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $902.5M | $11.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $665.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $583.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $440.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $396.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $317.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $322.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.8M | $241.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $190.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $912.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $855.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $860.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $656.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $870.3M | $555.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $481.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $902.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $911.0M | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.9M | $120.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-21.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -36.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.16× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $120.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $28.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-14.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.7M | $19.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $45.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.