vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($93.7M vs $57.8M, roughly 1.6× Nano Dimension Ltd.).
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
NNDM vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $57.8M | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | $-98.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | 43.1% | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | -155.1% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | -171.1% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.45 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.4M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $72.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-98.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-8.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.1% | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -155.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -171.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -279.4% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.45 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.35 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $317.2M | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $860.0M | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $902.5M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $317.2M | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.8M | $65.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $55.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $396.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $396.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $860.0M | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $870.3M | $566.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $560.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $902.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $911.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.71× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.9M | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-21.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -36.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.7M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.56× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NNDM
Segment breakdown not available.
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
