vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. (REPX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($113.9M vs $57.8M, roughly 2.0× Nano Dimension Ltd.). Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -61.8% vs -171.1%, a 109.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($24.6M vs $-21.1M).
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. is an independent energy company focused on exploration, development, and production of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids primarily in the US Permian Basin spanning Texas and New Mexico. It prioritizes cost-efficient onshore reserve development to supply reliable energy products to North American markets.
NNDM vs REPX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $57.8M | $113.9M |
| Net Profit | $-98.8M | $-70.4M |
| Gross Margin | 43.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -155.1% | 38.3% |
| Net Margin | -171.1% | -61.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 11.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.45 | $-3.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $113.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $97.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $106.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $85.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $102.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $102.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $102.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.4M | $105.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-70.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $30.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-98.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $33.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -155.1% | 31.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 50.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | -61.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -171.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -279.4% | 31.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-3.38 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.36 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.45 | $0.52 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.35 | $1.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $317.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $240.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $860.0M | $553.4M |
| Total Assets | $902.5M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.43× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $317.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $240.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $247.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $367.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $275.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $249.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $269.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $288.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $322.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $553.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $634.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $566.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $556.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $532.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $860.0M | $510.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $507.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $870.3M | $489.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $994.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $902.5M | $993.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $997.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $911.0M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.49× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.66× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.9M | $47.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-21.1M | $24.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -36.5% | 21.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 41.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $47.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $64.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $63.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $33.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $50.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $66.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $72.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.7M | $51.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $24.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.90× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.76× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.81× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.54× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
