vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($57.8M vs $39.4M, roughly 1.5× SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC). SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC runs the higher net margin — 54.9% vs -171.1%, a 226.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.4M vs $-21.1M).
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
NNDM vs SD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $57.8M | $39.4M |
| Net Profit | $-98.8M | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | 43.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -155.1% | 38.5% |
| Net Margin | -171.1% | 54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.45 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.4M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-98.8M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -155.1% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -171.1% | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -279.4% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.45 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.35 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $317.2M | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $860.0M | $510.9M |
| Total Assets | $902.5M | $644.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $317.2M | $98.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.8M | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $207.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $492.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $464.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $860.0M | $460.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $446.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $870.3M | $424.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $419.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $644.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $619.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $588.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $902.5M | $581.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $565.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $911.0M | $529.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $527.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.9M | $31.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-21.1M | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -36.5% | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 43.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $41.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.1M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.5% | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NNDM
Segment breakdown not available.
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |
