vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and Sila Realty Trust, Inc. (SILA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($57.8M vs $50.1M, roughly 1.2× Sila Realty Trust, Inc.). Sila Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.0% vs -171.1%, a 181.1% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
Sila Realty Trust, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust that owns, operates, and acquires high-quality income-generating commercial properties. Its core portfolio covers industrial logistics facilities, office assets and mixed-use properties, serving tenants across logistics, corporate and retail segments to deliver stable long-term returns.
NNDM vs SILA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $57.8M | $50.1M |
| Net Profit | $-98.8M | $5.0M |
| Gross Margin | 43.1% | 88.9% |
| Operating Margin | -155.1% | — |
| Net Margin | -171.1% | 10.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -54.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.45 | $0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $50.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $48.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $48.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $46.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.4M | $43.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $50.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-98.8M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 88.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 88.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 87.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 86.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.1% | 87.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 87.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | 86.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 89.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -155.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -171.1% | 23.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -279.4% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.45 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.35 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $317.2M | $32.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $860.0M | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $902.5M | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $27.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $24.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $317.2M | $39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.8M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $90.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $860.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $870.3M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $902.5M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $911.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.9M | $119.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-21.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -36.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 23.76× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $31.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $24.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $132.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $29.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.7M | $31.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $36.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.95× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.43× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.84× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.44× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
