vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and SILICOM LTD. (SILC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

SILICOM LTD. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($61.9M vs $57.8M, roughly 1.1× Nano Dimension Ltd.). SILICOM LTD. runs the higher net margin — -18.5% vs -171.1%, a 152.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. SILICOM LTD. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-3.3M vs $-21.1M).

Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.

Silicom Ltd. is a publicly traded company, headquartered in Israel, that specializes in the design, manufacture and marketing of connectivity solutions for a range of servers and server-based systems. Its shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Market and on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Silicom is a member of the RAD Group family of companies.

NNDM vs SILC — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
SILC
SILC
1.1× larger
SILC
$61.9M
$57.8M
NNDM
Higher net margin
SILC
SILC
152.5% more per $
SILC
-18.5%
-171.1%
NNDM
More free cash flow
SILC
SILC
$17.8M more FCF
SILC
$-3.3M
$-21.1M
NNDM

Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
NNDM
NNDM
SILC
SILC
Revenue
$57.8M
$61.9M
Net Profit
$-98.8M
$-11.5M
Gross Margin
43.1%
30.6%
Operating Margin
-155.1%
-19.8%
Net Margin
-171.1%
-18.5%
Revenue YoY
6.6%
Net Profit YoY
16.3%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.45
$-2.01

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
NNDM
NNDM
SILC
SILC
Q4 25
$61.9M
Q4 24
$57.8M
$58.1M
Q2 24
$28.4M
Q2 23
$29.7M
Net Profit
NNDM
NNDM
SILC
SILC
Q4 25
$-11.5M
Q4 24
$-98.8M
$-13.7M
Q2 24
$-79.2M
Q2 23
$12.6M
Gross Margin
NNDM
NNDM
SILC
SILC
Q4 25
30.6%
Q4 24
43.1%
28.6%
Q2 24
45.8%
Q2 23
44.0%
Operating Margin
NNDM
NNDM
SILC
SILC
Q4 25
-19.8%
Q4 24
-155.1%
-22.8%
Q2 24
Q2 23
Net Margin
NNDM
NNDM
SILC
SILC
Q4 25
-18.5%
Q4 24
-171.1%
-23.6%
Q2 24
-279.4%
Q2 23
42.3%
EPS (diluted)
NNDM
NNDM
SILC
SILC
Q4 25
$-2.01
Q4 24
$-0.45
$-2.28
Q2 24
$-0.35
Q2 23
$0.05

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
NNDM
NNDM
SILC
SILC
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$317.2M
$42.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$860.0M
$117.5M
Total Assets
$902.5M
$152.2M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
NNDM
NNDM
SILC
SILC
Q4 25
$42.1M
Q4 24
$317.2M
$72.1M
Q2 24
$231.8M
Q2 23
$454.6M
Stockholders' Equity
NNDM
NNDM
SILC
SILC
Q4 25
$117.5M
Q4 24
$860.0M
$127.8M
Q2 24
$870.3M
Q2 23
$1.1B
Total Assets
NNDM
NNDM
SILC
SILC
Q4 25
$152.2M
Q4 24
$902.5M
$150.4M
Q2 24
$911.0M
Q2 23
$1.2B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
NNDM
NNDM
SILC
SILC
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-18.9M
$-2.2M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-21.1M
$-3.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-36.5%
-5.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.8%
1.9%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
NNDM
NNDM
SILC
SILC
Q4 25
$-2.2M
Q4 24
$-18.9M
$18.3M
Q2 24
$-30.7M
Q2 23
$-56.1M
Free Cash Flow
NNDM
NNDM
SILC
SILC
Q4 25
$-3.3M
Q4 24
$-21.1M
$17.4M
Q2 24
Q2 23
FCF Margin
NNDM
NNDM
SILC
SILC
Q4 25
-5.4%
Q4 24
-36.5%
29.9%
Q2 24
Q2 23
Capex Intensity
NNDM
NNDM
SILC
SILC
Q4 25
1.9%
Q4 24
3.8%
1.6%
Q2 24
Q2 23
Cash Conversion
NNDM
NNDM
SILC
SILC
Q4 25
Q4 24
Q2 24
Q2 23
-4.47×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons