vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and BRAND HOUSE COLLECTIVE, INC. (TBHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BRAND HOUSE COLLECTIVE, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($103.5M vs $57.8M, roughly 1.8× Nano Dimension Ltd.). BRAND HOUSE COLLECTIVE, INC. runs the higher net margin — -3.6% vs -171.1%, a 167.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. Nano Dimension Ltd. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-21.1M vs $-26.8M).
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
Soho House is an international private members’ club with a focus on the media, arts and fashion industries.
NNDM vs TBHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $57.8M | $103.5M |
| Net Profit | $-98.8M | $-3.7M |
| Gross Margin | 43.1% | 20.4% |
| Operating Margin | -155.1% | -1.9% |
| Net Margin | -171.1% | -3.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 51.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.45 | $-0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $103.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $75.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $81.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $148.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $114.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $86.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.4M | $91.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $165.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-20.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-98.8M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-14.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 30.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.1% | 28.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | 29.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 32.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -155.1% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -15.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -26.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -14.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -171.1% | -6.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -16.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -279.4% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.90 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.45 | $-0.59 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.35 | $-0.68 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.80 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $317.2M | $6.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $860.0M | $-44.0M |
| Total Assets | $902.5M | $229.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $317.2M | $6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.8M | $3.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $64.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $85.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $61.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $34.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-44.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-35.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-16.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $860.0M | $-27.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $870.3M | $-5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $229.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $221.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $225.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $242.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $902.5M | $279.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $266.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $911.0M | $242.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $250.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.88× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.9M | $-25.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-21.1M | $-26.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -36.5% | -25.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-18.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-25.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $-12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.7M | $-13.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $28.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-26.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-7.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.1M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-13.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $26.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | -25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.5% | -11.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -15.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.51× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.79× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
