vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) and Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. (TCBX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($57.8M vs $57.7M, roughly 1.0× Third Coast Bancshares, Inc.). Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 28.4% vs -171.1%, a 199.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
Third Coast Bancshares, Inc. is a regional financial holding company headquartered in the U.S. Gulf Coast region. It provides a full suite of commercial and retail banking services including deposit products, business and consumer loans, mortgage services, and wealth management solutions, serving local small and medium-sized enterprises, individual consumers, and community clients across Texas and surrounding areas.
NNDM vs TCBX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2024 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $57.8M | $57.7M |
| Net Profit | $-98.8M | $16.4M |
| Gross Margin | 43.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -155.1% | — |
| Net Margin | -171.1% | 28.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 20.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.45 | $0.88 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $57.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $56.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $54.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $52.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $45.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $57.8M | $46.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $42.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.4M | $41.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $16.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $17.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $18.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-98.8M | $13.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-79.2M | $10.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 38.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 40.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -155.1% | 38.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -171.1% | 29.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -279.4% | 25.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.88 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.96 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.78 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.45 | $0.80 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.74 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.35 | $0.63 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $317.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $860.0M | $650.5M |
| Total Assets | $902.5M | $6.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $175.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $116.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $113.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $219.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $317.2M | $371.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $258.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.8M | $241.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | $650.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $531.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $513.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $496.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $479.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $860.0M | $460.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $450.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $870.3M | $435.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $902.5M | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $911.0M | $4.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-21.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -36.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $50.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $20.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $13.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $35.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.7M | $7.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.1M | $33.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.5% | 72.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.84× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NNDM
Segment breakdown not available.
TCBX
| Net Interest Income | $53.6M | 93% |
| Noninterest Income | $4.0M | 7% |
