vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NOAH HOLDINGS LTD (NOAH) and RYVYL Inc. (RVYL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Noah Holdings is a Chinese financial services company headquartered in Shanghai, China. It is the largest independent wealth management company in China.
RYVYL Inc. is a global fintech company that provides embedded financial services, point-of-sale solutions, payment processing, and digital banking tools primarily for small and medium-sized businesses. It operates mainly across North America and European markets, with core segments covering B2B payment infrastructure for retail and hospitality sectors.
NOAH vs RVYL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3K | $-9.6M |
| Net Profit | — | $-4.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 69.3% | — |
| Net Margin | — | 46.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -116.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 35.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-28.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.3K | $-9.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.6M | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4K | $2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.8M | $15.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2K | $-4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.2K | $2.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-5.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-12.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 41.9% |
| Q4 25 | 69.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -65.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 73.8% | -118.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | -5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.8% | 187.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | -129.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -449.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -11.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 46.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -70.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -302.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 155.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -182.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -407.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -16.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-28.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.80 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-137.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.76 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.45 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $96.8K | $7.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $668.0K |
| Total Assets | $223.8K | $13.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $96.8K | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.6M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.5K | $210.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $698.3M | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.1K | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $111.9K | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $668.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $-3.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.8K | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $20.5M |
| Q4 25 | $223.8K | $13.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.6M | $23.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $225.8K | $20.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $108.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $226.6K | $122.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $236.7K | $127.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $109.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $131.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.80× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.82× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-23.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-23.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 241.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | -0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-23.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.1M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-12.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-23.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.8M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $21.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-12.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 241.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 444.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 85.7% | -103.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -478.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 579.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -432.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 92.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
