vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NOAH HOLDINGS LTD (NOAH) and VirnetX Holding Corp (VHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VirnetX Holding Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($56.0K vs $2.3K, roughly 24.8× NOAH HOLDINGS LTD).
Noah Holdings is a Chinese financial services company headquartered in Shanghai, China. It is the largest independent wealth management company in China.
VirnetX is a publicly traded Internet security software and technology company based in Zephyr Cove, Nevada. Founded in 2005, its patent portfolio includes U.S. and international patents in areas such as DNS and network communication.
NOAH vs VHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3K | $56.0K |
| Net Profit | — | $-6.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 69.3% | -12151.8% |
| Net Margin | — | -11744.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -5.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-1.82 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.3K | $56.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.6M | $58.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4K | $48.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.8M | $0 | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2K | $0 | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.2K | $2.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-6.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.3M |
| Q4 25 | 69.3% | -12151.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -8006.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 73.8% | -8216.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.0% | -219350.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -441500.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -246300.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -11744.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -7496.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7543.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -191950.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -383000.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -214550.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.82 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.72 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $96.8K | $15.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $22.5M |
| Total Assets | $223.8K | $31.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $96.8K | $15.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.6M | $17.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.5K | $17.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $698.3M | $23.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.1K | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $111.9K | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $26.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $27.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $22.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0M | $29.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $33.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $36.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $184.8K | $45.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $48.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $52.2M |
| Q4 25 | $223.8K | $31.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $31.6M | $38.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $225.8K | $41.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $45.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $226.6K | $49.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $236.7K | $55.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $58.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $62.3M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-15.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-15.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -27966.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 30.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-15.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.1M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-15.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-15.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-15.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -27966.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5208.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 85.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -309100.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1100.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
