vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Inotiv, Inc. (NOTV) and Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($148.3M vs $120.9M, roughly 1.2× Inotiv, Inc.). Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.5% vs -23.5%, a 29.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (38.6% vs 0.8%). Inotiv, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-10.6M vs $-11.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (27.8% CAGR vs 0.8%).
Inotiv, Inc. is a contract research organization organized in Indiana and headquartered in Lafayette, Indiana. The company operates two core business units: Discovery and Safety Assessment (DSA) and Research Models and Services (RMS). The CRS business unit offers drug development and environmental sciences services, including safety assessment, analytical, metabolism, CMC and regulatory consultancy for small molecule drug candidates, biotherapeutics, and biomedical devices. The RMS business u...
Shoals Technologies Group is a leading provider of electrical balance of systems solutions for renewable energy and e-mobility. It supplies connectivity components for solar projects, energy storage systems and EV charging infrastructure, serving clients across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
NOTV vs SHLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $120.9M | $148.3M |
| Net Profit | $-28.4M | $8.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 31.6% |
| Operating Margin | -13.5% | 11.7% |
| Net Margin | -23.5% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.8% | 38.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2.7% | 3.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.83 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $120.9M | $148.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.1M | $135.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.7M | $110.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.3M | $80.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $119.9M | $107.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $130.4M | $102.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $105.8M | $99.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $119.0M | $90.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-28.4M | $8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.6M | $11.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-17.6M | $13.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-14.9M | $-282.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-27.6M | $7.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.9M | $-267.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.1M | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-48.1M | $4.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 40.2% |
| Q4 25 | -13.5% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.9% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | 14.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.4% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.9% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.1% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -19.6% | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -36.2% | 12.8% |
| Q4 25 | -23.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.2% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.5% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -12.0% | -0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.0% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -14.5% | -0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.7% | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -40.4% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.83 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.14 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.51 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.44 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.02 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.73 | $0.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.00 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.86 | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $12.7M | $7.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $405.8M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $109.0M | $600.0M |
| Total Assets | $734.3M | $904.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.72× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $12.7M | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.7M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.2M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.3M | $35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.0M | $23.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.4M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.4M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.7M | $15.2M |
| Q4 25 | $405.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $402.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $396.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $399.5M | $141.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $396.0M | $141.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $393.3M | $141.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $382.4M | $146.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $380.6M | $168.8M |
| Q4 25 | $109.0M | $600.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $136.0M | $589.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.8M | $575.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $157.7M | $558.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $169.8M | $556.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $170.5M | $545.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $182.1M | $544.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $207.2M | $554.0M |
| Q4 25 | $734.3M | $904.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $771.1M | $851.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $759.7M | $795.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $766.0M | $788.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $772.9M | $793.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $781.4M | $801.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $774.6M | $788.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $815.4M | $825.3M |
| Q4 25 | 3.72× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.96× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.76× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.53× | 0.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.33× | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.31× | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.10× | 0.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.84× | 0.30× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-5.4M | $-4.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-10.6M | $-11.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -8.8% | -7.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.3% | 4.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-28.7M | $-16.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-5.4M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.3M | $19.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.4M | $-13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-12.8M | $15.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.5M | $14.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $15.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.8M | $37.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.9M | $12.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-10.6M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.6M | $9.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.5M | $-26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-18.3M | $12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.0M | $12.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.7M | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-19.2M | $35.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.9M | $10.4M |
| Q4 25 | -8.8% | -7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.4% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.8% | -23.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.7% | 15.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.5% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5.9% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.2% | 36.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | 11.4% |
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.9% | 2.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.79× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.21× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.69× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NOTV
| Research Models And Services Segment | $72.9M | 60% |
| Discovery And Safety Assessment Segment | $48.0M | 40% |
SHLS
| System Solutions | $122.0M | 82% |
| Components | $26.3M | 18% |
