vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NATIONAL PRESTO INDUSTRIES INC (NPK) and Reynolds Consumer Products Inc. (REYN), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Reynolds Consumer Products Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.0B vs $164.0M, roughly 6.3× NATIONAL PRESTO INDUSTRIES INC). On growth, NATIONAL PRESTO INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.7% vs 1.2%). Reynolds Consumer Products Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($200.0M vs $12.4M). Over the past eight quarters, NATIONAL PRESTO INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (46.3% CAGR vs 11.4%).
National Presto Industries is a company founded in 1905 in Eau Claire, Wisconsin. Originally called "Northwestern Steel and Iron Works" the company changed its name to the "National Pressure Cooker Company" in 1929 and then National Presto Industries, Inc. 1953. The company originally produced pressure canners for commercial, and later home, use. Beginning in 1939, the company introduced small home-use cooking appliances. The company was admitted to the New York Stock Exchange on March 3, 1969.
The Rival Company is an American manufacturer of small appliances that produces products under the Bionaire, Crock-Pot, Fasco, Patton, Pollenex, Rival, Simer, and White Mountain brands. It became a wholly owned subsidiary of Holmes Products Corp. in 1999, and later became a brand of Sunbeam Products, a subsidiary of Jarden Corporation, which purchased Holmes in 2005. Jarden, in turn, merged with Newell Rubbermaid in 2016. It is now part of the Newell Brands company.
NPK vs REYN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $164.0M | $1.0B |
| Net Profit | — | $118.0M |
| Gross Margin | 16.9% | 25.7% |
| Operating Margin | 11.4% | 14.8% |
| Net Margin | — | 11.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 21.7% | 1.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -1.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $164.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $115.5M | $931.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $120.4M | $938.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.6M | $818.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $134.7M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.8M | $910.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $85.1M | $930.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $76.7M | $833.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $118.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3M | $79.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2M | $73.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.6M | $31.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.1M | $86.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1M | $97.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6M | $49.0M |
| Q4 25 | 16.9% | 25.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.9% | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.4% | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.5% | 23.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.3% | 27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | 26.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.3% | 27.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.1% | 24.1% |
| Q4 25 | 11.4% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.1% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.8% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.2% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.1% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.6% | 5.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.8M | $147.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $395.1M | $2.3B |
| Total Assets | $500.7M | $4.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.70× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $3.8M | $147.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6M | $53.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.8M | $57.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5M | $58.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.7M | $137.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.2M | $96.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $53.4M | $101.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $87.9M | $135.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $395.1M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $379.8M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $374.1M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $368.6M | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $367.6M | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $346.6M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.1M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $331.6M | $2.0B |
| Q4 25 | $500.7M | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $503.8M | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $471.9M | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $455.3M | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $453.4M | $4.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $428.9M | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $418.1M | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $417.5M | $4.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.76× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.79× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.92× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $13.9M | $237.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $12.4M | $200.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.6% | 19.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 0.9% | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | 2.01× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-36.2M | $316.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $13.9M | $237.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.6M | $93.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.9M | $91.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.5M | $56.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.6M | $182.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-17.5M | $124.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.9M | $84.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $99.0M |
| Q4 25 | $12.4M | $200.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-24.7M | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.4M | $51.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.5M | $17.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.3M | $141.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-20.3M | $93.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-34.5M | $65.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $70.0M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 19.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -21.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.1% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.2% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.4% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -22.1% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -40.6% | 7.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.7% | 8.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.01× | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.63× | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.12× | 1.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.64× | 1.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.16× | 1.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.58× | 0.87× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.85× | 2.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NPK
Segment breakdown not available.
REYN
| Reynolds Cooking And Baking | $397.0M | 38% |
| Hefty Waste And Storage | $247.0M | 24% |
| Tableware Products | $229.0M | 22% |
| Presto Products | $164.0M | 16% |