vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Enpro Inc. (NPO) and SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP (SXT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($435.8M vs $295.4M, roughly 1.5× Enpro Inc.). SENSIENT TECHNOLOGIES CORP runs the higher net margin — 10.1% vs -10.8%, a 21.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Enpro Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.3% vs 11.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Enpro Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs 3.9%).
Enpro is a US-based industrial technology company that designs and manufactures products and materials for technology-intensive sectors. The company serves industries such as semiconductors, aerospace, power generation, heavy-duty trucking, agricultural machinery, chemical processing, pulp and paper, and life sciences from 61 primary manufacturing facilities located in 12 countries, worldwide. It is organized under three segments: Sealing Technologies, Advanced Surface Technologies, and Engin...
Sensient Technologies is a global manufacturer and marketer of colors, flavors and fragrances based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Their products are used in many foods and beverages, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, home and personal care products, specialty printing and imaging products, computer imaging and industrial colors. Sensient reported revenue of $1,468 million in 2013. Subdivisions include the Sensient Flavors & Fragrances Group and the Sensient Color Group. Within the Flavors & Fragrances G...
NPO vs SXT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $295.4M | $435.8M |
| Net Profit | $-32.0M | $44.2M |
| Gross Margin | 42.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 15.3% |
| Net Margin | -10.8% | 10.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.3% | 11.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -330.2% | 28.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.50 | $1.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $435.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $295.4M | $393.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.6M | $412.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $288.1M | $414.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $273.2M | $392.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.4M | $376.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $260.9M | $392.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $403.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $44.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-32.0M | $25.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.6M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.4M | $37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.5M | $34.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.9M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.8M | $32.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | $30.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 42.1% | 31.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.9% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.3% | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.3% | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.3% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.3% | 33.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.8% | 32.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.2% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.3% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.9% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 13.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.7% | 12.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.8% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.6% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 7.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.04 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.50 | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.01 | $0.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.25 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.15 | $0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.65 | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.94 | $0.77 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.27 | $0.73 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $114.7M | $38.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $655.3M | $767.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.42× | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $38.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $114.7M | $36.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.9M | $42.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.1M | $56.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $240.3M | $32.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $236.3M | $26.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $206.9M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.9M | $30.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $767.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $655.3M | $709.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $640.1M | $613.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.42× | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.45× | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NPO
| Sealing Technologies Segment | $187.0M | 63% |
| General Industrial | $71.3M | 24% |
| Power Generation | $19.9M | 7% |
| Oiland Gas Market | $15.0M | 5% |
| Semiconductors | $2.2M | 1% |
SXT
Segment breakdown not available.
