vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Enpro Inc. (NPO) and Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp (ZWS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($407.2M vs $295.4M, roughly 1.4× Enpro Inc.). Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp runs the higher net margin — 10.3% vs -10.8%, a 21.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Enpro Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.3% vs 9.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Enpro Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs 4.4%).
Enpro is a US-based industrial technology company that designs and manufactures products and materials for technology-intensive sectors. The company serves industries such as semiconductors, aerospace, power generation, heavy-duty trucking, agricultural machinery, chemical processing, pulp and paper, and life sciences from 61 primary manufacturing facilities located in 12 countries, worldwide. It is organized under three segments: Sealing Technologies, Advanced Surface Technologies, and Engin...
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp designs, manufactures, and distributes a wide range of water management and dispensing products, including commercial plumbing fixtures, drinking fountains, water filtration systems, and flow control components. It serves commercial, residential, industrial, and public infrastructure markets primarily across North America, with a focus on delivering sustainable, water-efficient solutions for diverse end-user needs.
NPO vs ZWS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $295.4M | $407.2M |
| Net Profit | $-32.0M | $42.1M |
| Gross Margin | 42.1% | 44.4% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 14.8% |
| Net Margin | -10.8% | 10.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.3% | 9.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -330.2% | 15.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.50 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $295.4M | $407.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.6M | $455.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $288.1M | $444.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $273.2M | $388.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.4M | $370.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $260.9M | $410.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $412.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $257.5M | $373.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-32.0M | $42.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.6M | $61.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.4M | $50.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.5M | $43.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.9M | $36.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.8M | $43.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.7M | $46.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.5M | $34.3M |
| Q4 25 | 42.1% | 44.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.9% | 44.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.3% | 45.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.3% | 46.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.3% | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.3% | 46.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.8% | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 41.2% | 45.5% |
| Q4 25 | 11.2% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.3% | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.9% | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 16.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.5% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.1% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.7% | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.9% | 14.2% |
| Q4 25 | -10.8% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 11.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.6% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.8% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.9% | 9.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.50 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.01 | $0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.25 | $0.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.15 | $0.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.65 | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.94 | $0.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.27 | $0.27 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.59 | $0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $114.7M | $300.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $655.3M | $496.5M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.5B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.42× | 0.31× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $114.7M | $300.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $132.9M | $260.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.1M | $201.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $240.3M | $144.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $236.3M | $198.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $206.9M | $187.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $175.9M | $162.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $163.9M | $157.1M |
| Q4 25 | $655.3M | $496.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $496.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $495.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $495.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $640.1M | $495.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $495.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $495.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $644.9M | $495.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.42× | 0.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.45× | 0.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.31× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.46× | 0.31× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $91.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.18× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $91.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.3M | $101.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $52.2M | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.0M | $42.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.4M | $63.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.0M | $90.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.2M | $85.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.3M | $53.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $53.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.02× | 1.64× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.98× | 2.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.86× | 0.98× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.27× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.73× | 2.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.62× | 1.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.50× | 1.57× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NPO
| Sealing Technologies Segment | $187.0M | 63% |
| General Industrial | $71.3M | 24% |
| Power Generation | $19.9M | 7% |
| Oiland Gas Market | $15.0M | 5% |
| Semiconductors | $2.2M | 1% |
ZWS
Segment breakdown not available.
