vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) and RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (RYTM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($60.1M vs $21.9M, roughly 2.7× Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.). RHYTHM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. runs the higher net margin — -92.6% vs -148.5%, a 55.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (156.4% vs 83.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (67.9% CAGR vs 43.8%).
Energy Vault is a global energy storage company specializing in gravity and kinetic energy based, long-duration energy storage products. Energy Vault's primary product is a gravity battery to store energy by stacking heavy blocks made of composite material into a structure, capturing potential energy in the elevation gain of the blocks. When demand for electricity is high, these blocks are lowered with the motors functioning as generators and delivering electricity to the grid.
Rhythm Pharmaceuticals is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on developing and commercializing targeted therapies for rare genetic disorders causing severe unmanageable obesity, including POMC deficiency, LEPR deficiency, and Bardet-Biedl syndrome. It serves patients in North America and Europe who lack effective standard treatments for their chronic life-altering conditions.
NRGV vs RYTM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $21.9M | $60.1M |
| Net Profit | $-32.5M | $-55.6M |
| Gross Margin | 21.9% | 88.1% |
| Operating Margin | -32.5% | -87.1% |
| Net Margin | -148.5% | -92.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 156.4% | 83.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -53.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.20 | $-0.83 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $21.9M | $60.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $57.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $33.3M | $51.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5M | $48.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5M | $32.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.5M | $41.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2M | $33.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.8M | $29.1M |
| Q1 26 | $-32.5M | $-55.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-47.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.8M | $-52.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-34.9M | $-46.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.1M | $-49.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-61.8M | $-43.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.6M | $-43.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-26.2M | $-32.3M |
| Q1 26 | 21.9% | 88.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 91.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.0% | 89.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.6% | 88.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 57.1% | 88.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 90.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 40.3% | 88.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.8% | 89.9% |
| Q1 26 | -32.5% | -87.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -82.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -52.8% | -102.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -330.7% | -93.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -244.8% | -143.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -150.6% | -98.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2258.1% | -132.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -739.7% | -139.2% |
| Q1 26 | -148.5% | -92.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -83.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -80.5% | -103.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -410.3% | -96.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -247.7% | -151.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -184.7% | -103.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2217.9% | -131.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -694.6% | -110.9% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.20 | $-0.83 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.73 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.16 | $-0.82 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.22 | $-0.75 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | $-0.81 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.41 | $-0.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.18 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.18 | $-0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $55.2M | $340.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $160.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $30.5M | $122.9M |
| Total Assets | $298.0M | $442.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 5.27× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $55.2M | $340.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $388.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.7M | $416.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.3M | $291.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $21.2M | $314.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.0M | $320.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.1M | $298.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $106.8M | $319.1M |
| Q1 26 | $160.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $30.5M | $122.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $139.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.5M | $148.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $90.3M | $-11.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $114.9M | $18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $126.3M | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $179.1M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.6M | $39.3M |
| Q1 26 | $298.0M | $442.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $480.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $281.9M | $506.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $248.8M | $372.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $217.4M | $386.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $183.9M | $392.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $252.9M | $363.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $255.6M | $381.8M |
| Q1 26 | 5.27× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-53.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $-53.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.7M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.4M | $-23.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.7M | $-40.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-34.8M | $-18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.2M | $-25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.8M | $-29.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-27.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-45.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-36.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -81.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 81.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -111.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -135.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -3039.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -665.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 98.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 79.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 31.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2273.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 325.8% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
