vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA) and STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP (STRZ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($320.9M vs $187.0M, roughly 1.7× National Storage Affiliates Trust). National Storage Affiliates Trust runs the higher net margin — 12.2% vs -16.4%, a 28.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, National Storage Affiliates Trust posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-1.6% vs -7.5%). National Storage Affiliates Trust produced more free cash flow last quarter ($299.8M vs $-31.3M). Over the past eight quarters, National Storage Affiliates Trust's revenue compounded faster (-2.4% CAGR vs -40.6%).
National Storage Affiliates Trust is a U.S.-headquartered real estate investment trust focused on self-storage assets. It owns, operates and acquires self-storage facilities across dozens of U.S. states, offering secure storage solutions for residential and commercial customers.
Starz Entertainment Corp., formerly known as Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation, or simply Lionsgate, is a Canadian-American entertainment company currently headquartered in Santa Monica, California. Founded by Frank Giustra on July 10, 1997, it is/was domiciled and incorporated in Vancouver, British Columbia.
NSA vs STRZ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $187.0M | $320.9M |
| Net Profit | $22.9M | $-52.6M |
| Gross Margin | 72.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 20.2% | -10.8% |
| Net Margin | 12.2% | -16.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.6% | -7.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 36.8% | -71.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.23 | $-3.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $187.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $188.7M | $320.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $188.8M | $319.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $188.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $190.1M | $970.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $193.6M | $346.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $190.4M | $347.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $196.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $22.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.4M | $-52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.5M | $-42.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.7M | $-21.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.7M | $-30.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.1M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 72.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 70.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 70.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 70.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 72.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 72.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 72.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 72.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | -10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.5% | -8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.8% | -4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 48.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.8% | -16.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.3% | -13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.8% | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | -8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.23 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.17 | $-3.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.19 | $-2.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.19 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.18 | $-1.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.16 | $0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.65 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $23.3M | $37.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $608.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $946.0M | $663.2M |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.92× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $23.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.3M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.1M | $51.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.4M | $200.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $69.9M | $229.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.0M | $192.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $608.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $611.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $946.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $973.1M | $663.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $712.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $-168.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $986.9M | $935.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $973.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.92× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $338.5M | $-26.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $299.8M | $-31.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 160.3% | -9.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 20.7% | 1.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 14.79× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $541.5M | $-317.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $338.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $100.2M | $-26.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $79.9M | $65.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $85.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $363.1M | $-335.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $105.7M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $83.2M | $-33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $94.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $299.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.0M | $-31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.8M | $58.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $79.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $344.4M | $-349.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.8M | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.5M | $-38.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $88.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 160.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 46.6% | -9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.1% | 18.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 42.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 181.2% | -36.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.6% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 41.7% | -11.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 20.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 14.79× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.44× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.59× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.70× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.65× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.88× | -7.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.59× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NSA
Segment breakdown not available.
STRZ
| Over The Top Subscription Service OTT | $222.8M | 69% |
| Linear Subscription Service | $98.1M | 31% |
