vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of InspireMD, Inc. (NSPR) and Rithm Property Trust Inc. (RPT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Rithm Property Trust Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.4M vs $3.1M, roughly 1.1× InspireMD, Inc.). On growth, InspireMD, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (61.6% vs -39.7%). Over the past eight quarters, InspireMD, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (44.4% CAGR vs -43.2%).
InspireMD Inc. is a global medical device company specializing in innovative interventional cardiology and neurovascular solutions. Its flagship MGuard embolic protection stent line is engineered to reduce complications during vascular procedures, serving clinical customers across North America, Europe, and key Asia-Pacific markets, with a core focus on improving patient outcomes for acute coronary syndrome and stroke care.
Rithm Capital Corp. (Rithm) is an American investment management company headquartered in New York that focuses on real estate and alternative investments.
NSPR vs RPT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.1M | $3.4M |
| Net Profit | — | $3.2M |
| Gross Margin | 37.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -383.7% | 99.6% |
| Net Margin | — | 95.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 61.6% | -39.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 11.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-0.26 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $3.1M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | $249.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.7M | $-273.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.2M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.2M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 37.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -383.7% | 99.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -517.3% | -6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -732.2% | 45.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -749.5% | -1416.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -480.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -467.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -475.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -490.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 95.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -503.7% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -739.7% | 45.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -730.3% | -1363.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -435.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -454.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -465.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.26 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.17 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.26 | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.22 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.17 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.22 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.21 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $54.2M | $79.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $55.2M | $291.6M |
| Total Assets | $69.4M | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $54.2M | $79.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.4M | $81.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.4M | $98.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.1M | $97.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $55.2M | $291.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.1M | $291.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.2M | $294.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3M | $296.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $69.4M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $38.7M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $55.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.0M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.3M | $-8.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-9.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -309.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 12.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -2.56× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-36.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.6M | $-5.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.3M | $-25.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.8M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-9.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-9.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | -309.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -355.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -501.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -598.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -362.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -338.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -277.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -348.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -2.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NSPR
| Other | $1.7M | 55% |
| US | $1.4M | 45% |
RPT
Segment breakdown not available.
