vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NetApp (NTAP) and SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. (SITE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NetApp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.0B, roughly 1.6× SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.). NetApp runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs -0.9%, a 18.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs 2.8%). SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($150.3M vs $78.0M). Over the past eight quarters, SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.5% CAGR vs 3.0%).
NetApp, Inc. is an American data infrastructure company that provides unified data storage, integrated data services, and cloud operations (CloudOps) solutions to enterprise customers. The company is based in San Jose, California. It has ranked in the Fortune 500 from 2012 to 2021. Founded in 1992 with an initial public offering in 1995, NetApp offers cloud data services for management of applications and data both online and physically.
SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. is a leading North American wholesale distributor of landscape supplies. Its offerings cover irrigation components, outdoor lighting, hardscape materials, nursery plants, landscaping tools and related accessories. It mainly serves professional landscapers, contractors, golf course operators, municipal maintenance teams, with a wide branch network across the U.S. and Canada.
NTAP vs SITE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $1.0B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $-9.0M |
| Gross Margin | 72.0% | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | 23.4% | -0.5% |
| Net Margin | 17.9% | -0.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.8% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.0% | 58.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.51 | $-0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $939.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $904.8M |
| Q4 25 | $305.0M | $-9.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $233.0M | $59.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $340.0M | $129.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.0M | $-27.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.0M | $-21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $248.0M | $44.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.0M | $120.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.0M | $-19.3M |
| Q4 25 | 72.0% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 70.4% | 34.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 68.9% | 36.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 69.8% | 33.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 71.0% | 33.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 71.3% | 34.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.5% | 36.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 71.7% | 33.3% |
| Q4 25 | 23.4% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.1% | 12.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | -3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | -2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.9% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.8% | -2.5% |
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.6% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.2% | -2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.0% | -2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.4% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.5% | -2.1% |
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.15 | $1.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.64 | $2.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.44 | $-0.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.42 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.17 | $0.97 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.36 | $2.63 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.48 | $-0.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0B | $190.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.5B | $385.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $986.0M | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $9.6B | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.52× | 0.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $190.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $106.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $78.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $56.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $107.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $85.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $71.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $41.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $385.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | $388.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $469.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $503.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $388.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $410.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | $448.0M |
| Q4 25 | $986.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $975.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $995.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $892.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $929.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $994.0M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $9.6B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.0B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.4B | $3.0B |
| Q4 25 | 2.52× | 0.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.55× | 0.23× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.11× | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.00× | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.23× | 0.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.58× | 0.25× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.09× | 0.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.41× | 0.30× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $127.0M | $164.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $78.0M | $150.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.6% | 14.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.42× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $246.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.0M | $164.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $673.0M | $128.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $136.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $385.0M | $-129.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $119.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $341.0M | $115.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $613.0M | $147.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $484.0M | $-99.3M |
| Q4 25 | $78.0M | $150.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $620.0M | $118.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $122.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $338.0M | $-144.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $109.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $300.0M | $105.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $567.0M | $135.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $448.0M | $-108.2M |
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 14.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.8% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | -15.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.5% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.0% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.9% | -12.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.89× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.38× | 2.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.11× | 1.23× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.55× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NTAP
| Products | $788.0M | 46% |
| Support | $647.0M | 38% |
| Public Cloud Segment | $171.0M | 10% |
| Professional And Other Services | $99.0M | 6% |
SITE
| Landscaping Products | $798.4M | 76% |
| Agronomic | $247.2M | 24% |
