vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NetApp (NTAP) and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NetApp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.7B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.2× Texas Roadhouse, Inc.). NetApp runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs 5.8%, a 12.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.1% vs 2.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs 3.0%).
NetApp, Inc. is an American data infrastructure company that provides unified data storage, integrated data services, and cloud operations (CloudOps) solutions to enterprise customers. The company is based in San Jose, California. It has ranked in the Fortune 500 from 2012 to 2021. Founded in 1992 with an initial public offering in 1995, NetApp offers cloud data services for management of applications and data both online and physically.
Texas Roadhouse is an American steakhouse chain that specializes in steaks in a Texan and Southwestern cuisine style. It is a subsidiary of Texas Roadhouse Inc, which has two other concepts and is headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky. As of August 2025, the chain operates about 800 locations in 49 U.S. states and 70 international locations in 11 countries.
NTAP vs TXRH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.7B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $86.7M |
| Gross Margin | 72.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 23.4% | 6.5% |
| Net Margin | 17.9% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.8% | 3.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.0% | -26.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.51 | $1.29 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $1.3B |
| Q4 25 | $305.0M | $86.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $233.0M | $84.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $340.0M | $116.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $299.0M | $118.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $248.0M | $86.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $291.0M | $123.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $313.0M | $116.0M |
| Q4 25 | 72.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 70.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 68.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 69.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 71.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 71.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 71.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 23.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.8% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.3% | 8.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.9% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.8% | 10.1% |
| Q4 25 | 17.9% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.6% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.0% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.4% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 19.5% | 8.8% |
| Q4 25 | $1.51 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.15 | $1.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.64 | $1.70 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.44 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.42 | $1.73 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.17 | $1.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.36 | $1.79 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.48 | $1.69 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0B | $134.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $986.0M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $9.6B | $3.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.52× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $134.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $108.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $221.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $245.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $189.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $197.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.9B | $213.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $986.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $975.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $995.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $892.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $929.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $994.0M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $9.6B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.7B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.9B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.4B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | 2.52× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.11× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.00× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.23× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.58× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.09× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.41× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $127.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $78.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.42× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $127.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $673.0M | $143.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $237.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $385.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $237.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $341.0M | $138.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $613.0M | $133.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $484.0M | $243.4M |
| Q4 25 | $78.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $620.0M | $14.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $160.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $338.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $129.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $300.0M | $47.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $567.0M | $56.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $448.0M | $165.8M |
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.5% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.9% | 12.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.7% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.2% | 5.9% |
| Q4 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.89× | 1.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.38× | 1.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.11× | 1.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.55× | 2.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NTAP
| Products | $788.0M | 46% |
| Support | $647.0M | 38% |
| Public Cloud Segment | $171.0M | 10% |
| Professional And Other Services | $99.0M | 6% |
TXRH
| Food And Beverage | $1.5B | 99% |
| Texas Roadhouse Segment | $21.2M | 1% |
| Franchise | $8.2M | 1% |
| Franchise Royalty | $7.4M | 0% |
| Bubba S33Segment | $2.3M | 0% |
