vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP (NTIC) and Orange County Bancorp, Inc. (OBT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Orange County Bancorp, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($33.0M vs $23.3M, roughly 1.4× NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP). Orange County Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 37.6% vs 1.0%, a 36.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Orange County Bancorp, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (20.6% vs 9.2%). Orange County Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($41.3M vs $-479.7K). Over the past eight quarters, Orange County Bancorp, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (14.3% CAGR vs 5.8%).
Maxar Technologies Inc., was an American space technology company, specializing in geospatial intelligence, Earth observation, and on-orbit satellite servicing, satellite products, and related services. DigitalGlobe and MDA Holdings Company merged to become Maxar Technologies on October 5, 2017.
Orange County Bancorp, Inc. is a Delaware-registered bank holding company operating mainly in New York, U.S. It offers a full range of retail and commercial banking services, including deposit accounts, loans and wealth management solutions, serving individual consumers, small and mid-sized corporate clients in its regional footprint.
NTIC vs OBT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.3M | $33.0M |
| Net Profit | $237.8K | $12.4M |
| Gross Margin | 36.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | 41.4% |
| Net Margin | 1.0% | 37.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.2% | 20.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -57.6% | 73.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $0.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $23.3M | $33.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.3M | $33.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.5M | $32.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.1M | $28.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.3M | $27.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.3M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.7M | $27.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.8M | $25.3M |
| Q4 25 | $237.8K | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.1M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $121.8K | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $434.3K | $8.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $561.1K | $7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $976.6K | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | 36.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | 41.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.7% | 40.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 32.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 36.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | 45.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.9% | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 32.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 31.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 26.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 29.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.2% | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $0.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $0.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $0.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.64 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.19 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.73 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.17 | $0.82 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $72.4M | $284.4M |
| Total Assets | $104.0M | $2.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $72.4M | $284.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.1M | $270.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $252.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.7M | $201.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.2M | $185.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.2M | $193.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $68.9M | $177.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $68.4M | $168.7M |
| Q4 25 | $104.0M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.7M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.3M | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.7M | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.0M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $94.7M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.3M | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $87.3M | $2.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $341.9K | $43.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-479.7K | $41.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.1% | 125.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.5% | 7.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.44× | 3.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-1.8M | $69.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $341.9K | $43.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $609.7K | $-5.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $803.7K | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4M | $34.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9M | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-479.7K | $41.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | $29.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-171.2K | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $293.1K | $4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | $32.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $869.4K | $9.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0M |
| Q4 25 | -2.1% | 125.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.3% | 87.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | -17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | 15.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 120.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | 32.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | 3.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.01× | -0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.85× | 0.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.27× | 4.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.99× | 1.13× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NTIC
| Inside The USA To Unaffiliated Customers | $7.5M | 32% |
| Natur Tec | $6.0M | 26% |
| Acobal | $3.6M | 15% |
| Other | $2.7M | 12% |
| BR | $2.1M | 9% |
| Zerust OY | $1.4M | 6% |
OBT
Segment breakdown not available.
