vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP (NTIC) and RxSight, Inc. (RXST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RxSight, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($32.6M vs $23.3M, roughly 1.4× NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP). NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 1.0% vs -28.1%, a 29.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.2% vs -18.9%). NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-479.7K vs $-2.3M). Over the past eight quarters, NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (5.8% CAGR vs 5.1%).
Maxar Technologies Inc., was an American space technology company, specializing in geospatial intelligence, Earth observation, and on-orbit satellite servicing, satellite products, and related services. DigitalGlobe and MDA Holdings Company merged to become Maxar Technologies on October 5, 2017.
RxSight, Inc. is a medical technology company focused on developing and commercializing innovative intraocular lens solutions for patients undergoing cataract and refractive lens exchange procedures. Its flagship Light Adjustable Lens allows post-surgery power adjustment via a dedicated light delivery device, serving global ophthalmology care markets to improve post-operative visual outcomes for patients.
NTIC vs RXST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.3M | $32.6M |
| Net Profit | $237.8K | $-9.2M |
| Gross Margin | 36.0% | 77.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.0% | -34.8% |
| Net Margin | 1.0% | -28.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.2% | -18.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -57.6% | -54.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $23.3M | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.3M | $30.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.5M | $33.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.1M | $37.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.3M | $40.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.3M | $35.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.7M | $34.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.8M | $29.5M |
| Q4 25 | $237.8K | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.1M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $121.8K | $-11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $434.3K | $-8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $561.1K | $-5.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $976.6K | $-6.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $-9.1M |
| Q4 25 | 36.0% | 77.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.9% | 79.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.4% | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 35.6% | 74.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.3% | 71.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.8% | 71.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.2% | 69.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 40.0% | 70.1% |
| Q4 25 | 4.0% | -34.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | -40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.0% | -41.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.7% | -28.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | -21.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | -26.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | -23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | -36.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | -28.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.9% | -32.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | -35.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | -21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | -14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.9% | -17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | -17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.2% | -30.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $-0.29 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.04 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.19 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.17 | $-0.25 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $6.4M | $228.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $72.4M | $275.7M |
| Total Assets | $104.0M | $311.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $6.4M | $228.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.3M | $227.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8M | $227.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1M | $229.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6M | $237.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0M | $237.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8M | $233.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8M | $125.4M |
| Q4 25 | $72.4M | $275.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.1M | $276.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.4M | $278.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.7M | $279.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.2M | $281.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $71.2M | $277.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $68.9M | $275.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $68.4M | $163.9M |
| Q4 25 | $104.0M | $311.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $102.7M | $308.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.3M | $309.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $93.7M | $313.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $94.0M | $318.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $94.7M | $310.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.3M | $305.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $87.3M | $183.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $341.9K | $-1.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-479.7K | $-2.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.1% | -6.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.5% | 3.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.44× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-1.8M | $-19.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $341.9K | $-1.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $609.7K | $-4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $803.7K | $-8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $650.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-9.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-479.7K | $-2.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.4M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-171.2K | $-5.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $293.1K | $-9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | $-5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-453.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $869.4K | $-5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-11.3M |
| Q4 25 | -2.1% | -6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.3% | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | -17.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | -24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | -12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.2% | -15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -38.2% |
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.6% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.27× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.99× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NTIC
| Inside The USA To Unaffiliated Customers | $7.5M | 32% |
| Natur Tec | $6.0M | 26% |
| Acobal | $3.6M | 15% |
| Other | $2.7M | 12% |
| BR | $2.1M | 9% |
| Zerust OY | $1.4M | 6% |
RXST
| Rxlal | $28.2M | 86% |
| LDD | $3.0M | 9% |
| Service Warranty Service Contracts And Accessories | $1.5M | 4% |