vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (NTIP) and Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. (OPTT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($448.0K vs $424.0K, roughly 1.1× Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.). On growth, NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-8.6% vs -82.5%). Over the past eight quarters, NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (2.0% CAGR vs -51.4%).
Sterlite Technologies Limited is an Indian optical and digital technology company, headquartered in Pune. It is listed on Bombay Stock Exchange and National Stock Exchange of India. It has 636 patents and is active in over 150 countries. The company is specialized in optical networking which consists of optical fiber and cables, hyper-scale network design, and deployment and network software.
Ocean Power Technologies (OPT) is a U.S. publicly owned renewable energy company, providing electric power and communications solutions, services and related for remote offshore applications. The company's PowerBuoy wave energy conversion technology is theoretically scalable to hundreds of megawatts and the generated energy from wave power can be supplied to the grid via submarine cables. Several projects were undertaken around the world, but the economic viability of the theoretical concept ...
NTIP vs OPTT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $448.0K | $424.0K |
| Net Profit | — | $-10.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | -325.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | -2387.5% |
| Net Margin | — | -2553.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -8.6% | -82.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 9.3% | -176.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $448.0K | $424.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $0 | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.0K | $825.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $490.0K | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.0K | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $431.0K | $1.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-10.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-560.0K | $-7.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-463.0K | $-6.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-363.0K | $-6.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-316.0K | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-658.0K | $-6.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-920.0K | $-6.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | -325.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 72.0% | 23.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 72.0% | 54.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 45.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -2387.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -598.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -563.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -430.0% | -712.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -161.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -343.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -624.0% | -430.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -213.0% | -430.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -2553.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -625.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -487.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -242.0% | -814.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -161.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -342.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -658.0% | -427.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -213.5% | -363.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.01 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.04 | $-0.11 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $36.9M | $11.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $39.6M | $22.3M |
| Total Assets | $40.3M | $39.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $36.9M | $11.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.1M | $9.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $38.5M | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.2M | $10.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.6M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.5M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.6M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.4M | $9.1M |
| Q4 25 | $39.6M | $22.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.5M | $24.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.3M | $26.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.7M | $28.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.3M | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.6M | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.2M | $19.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $48.4M | $25.3M |
| Q4 25 | $40.3M | $39.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $41.0M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.8M | $30.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.9M | $34.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.4M | $26.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.6M | $29.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.1M | $28.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.6M | $34.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-869.0K | $-7.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-7.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1838.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 62.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-23.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-869.0K | $-7.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-104.0K | $-5.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-661.0K | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.0K | $-3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.1M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-25.0K | $-6.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-64.0K | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-596.0K | $-9.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-7.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-4.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-5.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-6.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-6.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-9.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | -1838.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -597.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -315.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -480.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -207.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -499.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -408.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -543.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 62.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 122.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 86.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.4% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
