vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Navitas Semiconductor Corp (NVTS) and UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES (UBFO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.5M vs $7.3M, roughly 1.9× Navitas Semiconductor Corp). UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES runs the higher net margin — 25.2% vs -436.1%, a 461.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.6% vs -59.4%). UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES produced more free cash flow last quarter ($19.8M vs $-8.2M). Over the past eight quarters, UNITED SECURITY BANCSHARES's revenue compounded faster (3.0% CAGR vs -43.9%).
Navitas Semiconductor Corp is a leading global semiconductor firm specializing in gallium nitride (GaN) power integrated circuits. Its high-efficiency, compact power solutions serve consumer electronics, electric vehicles, renewable energy, and industrial sectors, with clients spanning North America, Asia, and Europe.
United Security Bancshares is a bank holding company headquartered in Fresno, California. It operates 11 branches.
NVTS vs UBFO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.3M | $13.5M |
| Net Profit | $-31.8M | $3.4M |
| Gross Margin | 38.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -567.3% | 31.5% |
| Net Margin | -436.1% | 25.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -59.4% | 13.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 20.2% | 36.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.14 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $7.3M | $13.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.1M | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.5M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0M | $13.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.0M | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.7M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.5M | $13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.2M | $12.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-31.8M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.2M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-49.1M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-16.8M | $2.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.9M | $2.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-18.7M | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-22.3M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.7M | $4.2M |
| Q4 25 | 38.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 41.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -567.3% | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -192.0% | 40.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -149.4% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -180.5% | 27.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -216.9% | 27.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -133.6% | 37.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -152.1% | 46.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -136.2% | 45.9% |
| Q4 25 | -436.1% | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -190.2% | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -338.7% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -120.1% | 19.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -221.7% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -86.4% | 27.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -109.1% | 33.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.9% | 32.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.14 | $0.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.25 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.09 | $0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.22 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $0.25 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.02 | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $236.9M | $264.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $443.7M | $139.7M |
| Total Assets | $500.5M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $236.9M | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $150.6M | $211.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $161.2M | $199.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.1M | $198.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $86.7M | $216.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $98.3M | $216.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $111.7M | $166.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $128.9M | $168.6M |
| Q4 25 | $443.7M | $139.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $371.0M | $137.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $388.9M | $134.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $341.8M | $132.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $348.0M | $130.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $380.8M | $132.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $388.1M | $127.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $397.9M | $124.2M |
| Q4 25 | $500.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $430.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $449.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $370.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $390.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $419.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $439.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $467.9M | $1.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.1M | $22.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.2M | $19.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -111.8% | 146.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 16.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 6.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-44.4M | $36.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-8.1M | $22.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.0M | $7.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.2M | $8.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.5M | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.2M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-13.7M | $5.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-15.1M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-19.8M | $7.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.2M | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.7M | $6.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.9M | $8.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.6M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-10.8M | $18.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.3M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-17.9M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-22.7M | $7.0M |
| Q4 25 | -111.8% | 146.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -106.1% | 43.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -82.2% | 64.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -96.8% | 21.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -59.8% | 156.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -65.9% | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -87.3% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -97.9% | 54.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | 16.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.0% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.5% | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.79× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
