vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NEWELL BRANDS INC. (NWL) and Science Applications International Corp (SAIC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NEWELL BRANDS INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.0× Science Applications International Corp). Science Applications International Corp runs the higher net margin — 4.2% vs -16.6%, a 20.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Science Applications International Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.6% vs -2.7%). Science Applications International Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($120.0M vs $91.0M). Over the past eight quarters, NEWELL BRANDS INC.'s revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs 2.3%).
Newell Brands Inc. is an American conglomerate of consumer and commercial products. The company's brands and products include Rubbermaid storage/or waste disposal containers; home organization and reusable container products; Contigo and Bubba water bottles; Coleman outdoor products; writing instruments glue ; children's products ; cookware and small appliances and fragrance products.
Science Applications International Corporation, Inc. (SAIC) is an American technology company headquartered in Reston, Virginia that provides government services and information technology support.
NWL vs SAIC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $-315.0M | $78.0M |
| Gross Margin | 33.1% | 12.2% |
| Operating Margin | -14.3% | 6.9% |
| Net Margin | -16.6% | 4.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.7% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -483.3% | -3.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.75 | $1.69 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $-315.0M | $78.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.0M | $68.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-37.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.0M | $106.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-198.0M | $81.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.0M | $77.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.0M | $39.0M |
| Q4 25 | 33.1% | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.4% | 11.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.2% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.9% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.4% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.5% | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | -14.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.2% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 4.5% |
| Q4 25 | -16.6% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.2% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.5% | 2.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.75 | $1.69 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | $1.42 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $2.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.48 | $1.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $1.48 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.02 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $203.0M | $45.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $10.7B | $5.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.64× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $203.0M | $45.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $229.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $219.0M | $47.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $233.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $198.0M | $46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $494.0M | $48.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $382.0M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $372.0M | $94.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.1B |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $10.7B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $5.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.0B | $5.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0B | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.1B | $5.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.18× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $161.0M | $129.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $91.0M | $120.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.8% | 6.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.7% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $17.0M | $478.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $161.0M | $129.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-58.0M | $100.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-213.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.0M | $143.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.0M | $98.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.0M | $63.0M |
| Q4 25 | $91.0M | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $315.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-117.0M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-272.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.0M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $132.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.0M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-27.0M | $52.0M |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.9% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.6% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 3.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | 0.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.81× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.26× | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.71× | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.62× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NWL
| Kitchen | $538.0M | 28% |
| Writing | $370.0M | 20% |
| Commercial | $320.0M | 17% |
| Financial Institution Two | $286.0M | 15% |
| Baby | $259.0M | 14% |
| Outdoor And Recreation | $142.0M | 7% |
SAIC
| Prime Contractor | $1.3B | 71% |
| Civilian | $427.0M | 23% |
| Subcontractor | $116.0M | 6% |
| Commercial State And Local Agencies | $7.0M | 0% |
