vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of NEWELL BRANDS INC. (NWL) and STIFEL FINANCIAL CORP (SF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

NEWELL BRANDS INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.7× STIFEL FINANCIAL CORP). STIFEL FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 23.5% vs -16.6%, a 40.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, STIFEL FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (23.0% vs -2.7%). STIFEL FINANCIAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($369.0M vs $91.0M). Over the past eight quarters, STIFEL FINANCIAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (21.1% CAGR vs 7.1%).

Newell Brands Inc. is an American conglomerate of consumer and commercial products. The company's brands and products include Rubbermaid storage/or waste disposal containers; home organization and reusable container products; Contigo and Bubba water bottles; Coleman outdoor products; writing instruments glue ; children's products ; cookware and small appliances and fragrance products.

Stifel Financial Corp. is an American multinational independent investment bank and financial services company created under the Stifel name in July 1983 and listed on the New York Stock Exchange on November 24, 1986. Its predecessor company was founded in 1890 as the Altheimer and Rawlings Investment Company and is headquartered in downtown St. Louis, Missouri.

NWL vs SF — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
NWL
NWL
1.7× larger
NWL
$1.9B
$1.1B
SF
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
SF
SF
+25.7% gap
SF
23.0%
-2.7%
NWL
Higher net margin
SF
SF
40.1% more per $
SF
23.5%
-16.6%
NWL
More free cash flow
SF
SF
$278.0M more FCF
SF
$369.0M
$91.0M
NWL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
SF
SF
Annualised
SF
21.1%
7.1%
NWL

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
NWL
NWL
SF
SF
Revenue
$1.9B
$1.1B
Net Profit
$-315.0M
$264.4M
Gross Margin
33.1%
Operating Margin
-14.3%
27.3%
Net Margin
-16.6%
23.5%
Revenue YoY
-2.7%
23.0%
Net Profit YoY
-483.3%
8.3%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.75
$2.30

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
NWL
NWL
SF
SF
Q4 25
$1.9B
$1.1B
Q3 25
$1.8B
$962.6M
Q2 25
$1.9B
$838.9M
Q1 25
$1.6B
$842.5M
Q4 24
$1.9B
$916.0M
Q3 24
$1.9B
$810.9M
Q2 24
$2.0B
$798.9M
Q1 24
$1.7B
$768.1M
Net Profit
NWL
NWL
SF
SF
Q4 25
$-315.0M
$264.4M
Q3 25
$21.0M
$211.4M
Q2 25
$46.0M
$155.1M
Q1 25
$-37.0M
$53.0M
Q4 24
$-54.0M
$244.0M
Q3 24
$-198.0M
$158.5M
Q2 24
$45.0M
$165.3M
Q1 24
$-9.0M
$163.6M
Gross Margin
NWL
NWL
SF
SF
Q4 25
33.1%
Q3 25
34.1%
Q2 25
35.4%
Q1 25
32.1%
Q4 24
34.2%
Q3 24
34.9%
Q2 24
34.4%
Q1 24
30.5%
Operating Margin
NWL
NWL
SF
SF
Q4 25
-14.3%
27.3%
Q3 25
6.6%
29.7%
Q2 25
8.8%
25.5%
Q1 25
1.3%
7.5%
Q4 24
0.5%
29.1%
Q3 24
-6.2%
26.7%
Q2 24
8.0%
28.4%
Q1 24
1.0%
28.5%
Net Margin
NWL
NWL
SF
SF
Q4 25
-16.6%
23.5%
Q3 25
1.2%
22.0%
Q2 25
2.4%
18.5%
Q1 25
-2.4%
6.3%
Q4 24
-2.8%
26.6%
Q3 24
-10.2%
19.5%
Q2 24
2.2%
20.7%
Q1 24
-0.5%
21.3%
EPS (diluted)
NWL
NWL
SF
SF
Q4 25
$-0.75
$2.30
Q3 25
$0.05
$1.84
Q2 25
$0.11
$1.34
Q1 25
$-0.09
$0.39
Q4 24
$-0.13
$2.10
Q3 24
$-0.48
$1.34
Q2 24
$0.11
$1.41
Q1 24
$-0.02
$1.40

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
NWL
NWL
SF
SF
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$203.0M
$2.3B
Total DebtLower is stronger
$617.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$2.4B
$6.0B
Total Assets
$10.7B
$41.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.10×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
NWL
NWL
SF
SF
Q4 25
$203.0M
$2.3B
Q3 25
$229.0M
$3.2B
Q2 25
$219.0M
$1.9B
Q1 25
$233.0M
$2.7B
Q4 24
$198.0M
$2.6B
Q3 24
$494.0M
$1.9B
Q2 24
$382.0M
$2.6B
Q1 24
$372.0M
$3.4B
Total Debt
NWL
NWL
SF
SF
Q4 25
$617.4M
Q3 25
$617.2M
Q2 25
$617.0M
Q1 25
$616.8M
Q4 24
$616.6M
Q3 24
$616.4M
Q2 24
$1.1B
Q1 24
$1.1B
Stockholders' Equity
NWL
NWL
SF
SF
Q4 25
$2.4B
$6.0B
Q3 25
$2.7B
$5.8B
Q2 25
$2.7B
$5.6B
Q1 25
$2.7B
$5.5B
Q4 24
$2.8B
$5.7B
Q3 24
$2.9B
$5.6B
Q2 24
$3.1B
$5.4B
Q1 24
$3.1B
$5.3B
Total Assets
NWL
NWL
SF
SF
Q4 25
$10.7B
$41.3B
Q3 25
$11.3B
$41.7B
Q2 25
$11.5B
$39.9B
Q1 25
$11.3B
$40.4B
Q4 24
$11.0B
$39.9B
Q3 24
$11.8B
$38.9B
Q2 24
$12.0B
$37.8B
Q1 24
$12.1B
$38.3B
Debt / Equity
NWL
NWL
SF
SF
Q4 25
0.10×
Q3 25
0.11×
Q2 25
0.11×
Q1 25
0.11×
Q4 24
0.11×
Q3 24
0.11×
Q2 24
0.21×
Q1 24
0.21×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
NWL
NWL
SF
SF
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$161.0M
$382.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$91.0M
$369.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
4.8%
32.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.7%
1.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.45×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$17.0M
$1.1B

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
NWL
NWL
SF
SF
Q4 25
$161.0M
$382.4M
Q3 25
$374.0M
$338.3M
Q2 25
$-58.0M
$607.5M
Q1 25
$-213.0M
$-211.2M
Q4 24
$150.0M
$694.6M
Q3 24
$282.0M
$198.3M
Q2 24
$32.0M
$207.2M
Q1 24
$32.0M
$-609.7M
Free Cash Flow
NWL
NWL
SF
SF
Q4 25
$91.0M
$369.0M
Q3 25
$315.0M
$321.1M
Q2 25
$-117.0M
$592.7M
Q1 25
$-272.0M
$-227.8M
Q4 24
$54.0M
$677.2M
Q3 24
$231.0M
$185.6M
Q2 24
$-21.0M
$173.3M
Q1 24
$-27.0M
$-619.4M
FCF Margin
NWL
NWL
SF
SF
Q4 25
4.8%
32.7%
Q3 25
17.4%
33.4%
Q2 25
-6.0%
70.6%
Q1 25
-17.4%
-27.0%
Q4 24
2.8%
73.9%
Q3 24
11.9%
22.9%
Q2 24
-1.0%
21.7%
Q1 24
-1.6%
-80.6%
Capex Intensity
NWL
NWL
SF
SF
Q4 25
3.7%
1.2%
Q3 25
3.3%
1.8%
Q2 25
3.0%
1.8%
Q1 25
3.8%
2.0%
Q4 24
4.9%
1.9%
Q3 24
2.6%
1.6%
Q2 24
2.6%
4.2%
Q1 24
3.6%
1.3%
Cash Conversion
NWL
NWL
SF
SF
Q4 25
1.45×
Q3 25
17.81×
1.60×
Q2 25
-1.26×
3.92×
Q1 25
-3.99×
Q4 24
2.85×
Q3 24
1.25×
Q2 24
0.71×
1.25×
Q1 24
-3.73×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

NWL
NWL

Kitchen$538.0M28%
Writing$370.0M20%
Commercial$320.0M17%
Financial Institution Two$286.0M15%
Baby$259.0M14%
Outdoor And Recreation$142.0M7%

SF
SF

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons