vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of NEWELL BRANDS INC. (NWL) and Tennessee Valley Authority (TVE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tennessee Valley Authority is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.0B vs $1.9B, roughly 1.6× NEWELL BRANDS INC.). Tennessee Valley Authority runs the higher net margin — 8.7% vs -16.6%, a 25.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tennessee Valley Authority posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.4% vs -2.7%). NEWELL BRANDS INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($91.0M vs $-814.0M). Over the past eight quarters, NEWELL BRANDS INC.'s revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs -1.7%).
Newell Brands Inc. is an American conglomerate of consumer and commercial products. The company's brands and products include Rubbermaid storage/or waste disposal containers; home organization and reusable container products; Contigo and Bubba water bottles; Coleman outdoor products; writing instruments glue ; children's products ; cookware and small appliances and fragrance products.
The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) is a federally-owned electric utility corporation in the United States. TVA's service area covers all of Tennessee, portions of Alabama, Mississippi, and Kentucky, and small areas of Georgia, North Carolina, and Virginia. While owned by the federal government, TVA receives no taxpayer funding and operates similarly to a private for-profit company. It is headquartered in Knoxville, Tennessee, and is the sixth-largest power supplier and largest public utilit...
NWL vs TVE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.9B | $3.0B |
| Net Profit | $-315.0M | $266.0M |
| Gross Margin | 33.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -14.3% | 18.1% |
| Net Margin | -16.6% | 8.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.7% | 4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -483.3% | 112.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.75 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7B | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | $-315.0M | $266.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.0M | $615.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.0M | $212.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-37.0M | $408.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.0M | $125.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-198.0M | $520.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.0M | $181.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.0M | $307.0M |
| Q4 25 | 33.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 30.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -14.3% | 18.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 23.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.8% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 20.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.2% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.0% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 18.4% |
| Q4 25 | -16.6% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.4% | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10.2% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.5% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.75 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.48 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.02 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $203.0M | $501.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | — |
| Total Assets | $10.7B | $59.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $203.0M | $501.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $229.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $219.0M | $501.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $233.0M | $502.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $198.0M | $507.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $494.0M | $502.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $382.0M | $501.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $372.0M | $508.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $10.7B | $59.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3B | $60.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $59.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.3B | $59.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.0B | $58.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8B | $57.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.0B | $56.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.1B | $52.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $161.0M | $330.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $91.0M | $-814.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.8% | -26.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.7% | 37.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $17.0M | $-1.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $161.0M | $330.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-58.0M | $615.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-213.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $150.0M | $450.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.0M | $508.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $32.0M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $91.0M | $-814.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $315.0M | $233.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-117.0M | $-431.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-272.0M | $-176.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $54.0M | $-759.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $164.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-21.0M | $-248.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-27.0M | $276.0M |
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | -26.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.4% | 6.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.0% | -13.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -17.4% | -5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | -26.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | -8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.6% | 8.8% |
| Q4 25 | 3.7% | 37.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.3% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 25.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | 26.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.6% | 24.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.81× | 2.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.26× | 2.90× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.60× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.71× | 2.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.38× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
NWL
| Kitchen | $538.0M | 28% |
| Writing | $370.0M | 20% |
| Commercial | $320.0M | 17% |
| Financial Institution Two | $286.0M | 15% |
| Baby | $259.0M | 14% |
| Outdoor And Recreation | $142.0M | 7% |
TVE
| TN | $2.0B | 65% |
| AL | $449.0M | 15% |
| MS | $266.0M | 9% |
| KY | $193.0M | 6% |
| GA | $75.0M | 2% |
| Federal Agencies And Other | $29.0M | 1% |
| NC | $23.0M | 1% |
| VA | $12.0M | 0% |
| Off System Sales Member | $2.0M | 0% |
