vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Nayax Ltd. (NYAX) and SOLENO THERAPEUTICS INC (SLNO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nayax Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($78.1M vs $66.0M, roughly 1.2× SOLENO THERAPEUTICS INC). SOLENO THERAPEUTICS INC runs the higher net margin — 39.4% vs -3.9%, a 43.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Nayax Ltd. is a global fintech company that offers cashless, telemetry, management, monitoring, and business intelligence (BI) products and services for the vending, unattended, and other retail industries.
SOLENO THERAPEUTICS INC is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company specializing in developing novel therapies for rare endocrine, metabolic, and neurodevelopmental disorders. Its lead product candidate targets Prader-Willi syndrome, a rare genetic condition, with key patient markets across North America and the European Union.
NYAX vs SLNO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2024 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $78.1M | $66.0M |
| Net Profit | $-3.0M | $26.0M |
| Gross Margin | 44.3% | 98.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.2% | 33.5% |
| Net Margin | -3.9% | 39.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 39.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 24.2% | 134.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.08 | $0.47 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $66.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $32.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.1M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $56.2M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.0M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-4.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 98.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 97.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.3% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 37.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -20.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -6.6% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.9% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -7.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $0.47 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.12 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $61.9M | $498.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $158.7M | $494.8M |
| Total Assets | $434.7M | $599.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $498.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $286.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $61.9M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $31.1M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $494.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $240.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $158.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $100.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $599.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $332.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $434.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $261.8M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.2M | $43.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $43.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 65.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.67× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $43.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-12.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.2M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-1.7M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $43.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-12.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 65.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -38.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 1.67× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
