vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Owens Corning (OC) and SIRIUS XM HOLDINGS INC. (SIRI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Owens Corning is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.3B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.1× SIRIUS XM HOLDINGS INC.). SIRIUS XM HOLDINGS INC. runs the higher net margin — 11.7% vs 1.7%, a 10.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SIRIUS XM HOLDINGS INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.1% vs -10.5%). SIRIUS XM HOLDINGS INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($171.0K vs $-387.0M). Over the past eight quarters, SIRIUS XM HOLDINGS INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-2.0% CAGR vs -9.9%).
Owens Corning is an American company that develops and produces insulation, roofing, and fiberglass composites and related products. It is the world's largest manufacturer of fiberglass composites. It was formed in 1935 as a partnership between two major American glassworks, Corning Glass Works and Owens-Illinois. The company employs approximately 19,000 people around the world. Owens Corning has been a Fortune 500 company every year since the list was created in 1955. The Pink Panther is the...
XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. (XM) was one of the three satellite radio (SDARS) and online radio services in the United States and Canada, operated by Sirius XM Holdings. It provided pay-for-service radio, analogous to subscription cable television. Its service included 73 different music channels, 39 news, sports, talk and entertainment channels, 21 regional traffic and weather channels, and 23 play-by-play sports channels. XM channels were identified by Arbitron with the label "XM".
OC vs SIRI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $38.0M | $245.0M |
| Gross Margin | 22.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.3% | 21.7% |
| Net Margin | 1.7% | 11.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -10.5% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -11.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.47 | $0.72 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | $38.0M | $245.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-298.0M | $99.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-494.0M | $297.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $363.0M | $205.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-93.0M | $204.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-258.0M | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.0M | $-2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $285.0M | $304.0M |
| Q1 26 | 22.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.2% | 53.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.2% | 52.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.2% | 52.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.7% | 52.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.1% | 52.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.8% | 53.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.1% | 53.5% |
| Q1 26 | 5.3% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -10.5% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.2% | 22.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | 18.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.5% | 20.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.7% | -133.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.4% | 23.2% |
| Q1 26 | 1.7% | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -13.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.4% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3.7% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.1% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.5% | -113.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.2% | 14.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.47 | $0.72 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.47 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.92 | $0.84 | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.25 | $0.57 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.08 | $0.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.92 | $2.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.65 | $-8.74 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.24 | $0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $272.0M | $75.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.7B | $11.7B |
| Total Assets | $13.1B | $27.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.38× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $272.0M | $75.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $345.0M | $94.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $286.0M | $79.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $230.0M | $92.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $400.0M | $127.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $361.0M | $162.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $499.0M | $127.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $254.0M | $100.0M |
| Q1 26 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.7B | $8.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.7B | $9.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.1B | $10.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0B | $10.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $10.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $10.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $9.0B |
| Q1 26 | $3.7B | $11.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.9B | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.4B | $11.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $11.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $11.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $11.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6B | $10.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5B | $-2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $13.1B | $27.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.0B | $27.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.5B | $27.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.5B | $27.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.3B | $27.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.1B | $27.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.1B | $27.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.0B | $11.2B |
| Q1 26 | 1.38× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.22× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.06× | 0.78× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.98× | 0.89× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.03× | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.01× | 0.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.89× | 0.93× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.92× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $271.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-387.0M | $171.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -17.1% | 0.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $827.0M | $1.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $271.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $590.0M | $680.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $918.0M | $430.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $327.0M | $546.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-49.0M | $242.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $676.0M | $679.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $699.0M | $240.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $493.0M | $514.0M |
| Q1 26 | $-387.0M | $171.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $333.0M | $536.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $752.0M | $255.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $129.0M | $401.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-252.0M | $53.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $479.0M | $514.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $558.0M | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $336.0M | $341.0M |
| Q1 26 | -17.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.5% | 24.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.0% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.7% | 18.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.9% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.0% | 15.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.0% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.2% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.0% | 9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.9% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 7.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 6.87× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.90× | 2.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.73× | 1.69× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OC
Segment breakdown not available.
SIRI
| Subscriber revenue | $1.5B | 71% |
| Other | $501.0M | 24% |
| Equipment revenue | $41.0M | 2% |
| Advertising revenue | $35.0M | 2% |
| Other revenue | $31.0M | 1% |
