vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OCULAR THERAPEUTIX, INC (OCUL) and Postal Realty Trust, Inc. (PSTL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Postal Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($26.0M vs $13.3M, roughly 2.0× OCULAR THERAPEUTIX, INC). Postal Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs -488.0%, a 505.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Postal Realty Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.7% vs -22.4%). Postal Realty Trust, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($37.6M vs $-57.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Postal Realty Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (22.6% CAGR vs -5.3%).
Ocular Therapeutix, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical firm specializing in developing and commercializing innovative ophthalmic therapies. Its products treat acute and chronic eye conditions including post-surgical pain, glaucoma, and dry eye, serving patients and ophthalmology providers primarily across the U.S. and select global markets.
Postal Realty Trust, Inc. is a specialized real estate investment trust that acquires, owns, and manages properties primarily leased to the United States Postal Service. Its portfolio includes last-mile postal facilities, sorting centers, and retail post office locations across the U.S., supporting critical mail and package delivery infrastructure.
OCUL vs PSTL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.3M | $26.0M |
| Net Profit | $-64.7M | $4.6M |
| Gross Margin | 88.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -526.5% | 39.2% |
| Net Margin | -488.0% | 17.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -22.4% | 21.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.6% | 3.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.27 | $0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.5M | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.5M | $23.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.7M | $22.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.1M | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.4M | $19.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.4M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.8M | $17.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.7M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-69.4M | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-67.8M | $3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-64.1M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-48.4M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-36.5M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-43.8M | $817.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-64.8M | $206.0K |
| Q4 25 | 88.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 87.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 85.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 88.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 92.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 89.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 90.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 91.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -526.5% | 39.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -472.3% | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -502.6% | 37.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -597.5% | 28.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -296.1% | 43.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -298.2% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -265.1% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -214.0% | 17.6% |
| Q4 25 | -488.0% | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -477.3% | 15.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -503.9% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -598.7% | 9.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -283.3% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -236.6% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -266.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -438.9% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.27 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.38 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.39 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.38 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.25 | $0.17 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.22 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.26 | $0.02 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.49 | $-0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $737.1M | $1.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $361.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $654.3M | $285.2M |
| Total Assets | $808.1M | $759.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.27× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $737.1M | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $344.8M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $391.1M | $1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $349.7M | $639.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $392.1M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $427.2M | $970.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $459.7M | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $482.9M | $1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $361.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $347.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $328.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $306.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $296.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $277.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $273.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $247.6M |
| Q4 25 | $654.3M | $285.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $258.2M | $273.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $305.9M | $250.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.9M | $245.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $315.3M | $251.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $352.0M | $245.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $377.7M | $245.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $408.0M | $248.1M |
| Q4 25 | $808.1M | $759.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $410.9M | $735.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $451.3M | $689.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $405.9M | $654.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $457.9M | $646.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $490.4M | $615.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $517.1M | $608.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $538.9M | $584.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.00× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-54.2M | $44.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-57.1M | $37.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -430.9% | 144.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 21.4% | 26.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.59× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-216.9M | $65.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-54.2M | $44.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-50.7M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-55.2M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-44.7M | $10.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.4M | $33.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-36.6M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-24.8M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-33.9M | $6.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.1M | $37.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-56.7M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-56.5M | $9.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-46.6M | $10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.6M | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-36.6M | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.5M | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-34.1M | $5.8M |
| Q4 25 | -430.9% | 144.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -390.0% | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -419.7% | 38.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -435.6% | 45.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -232.0% | 143.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -237.6% | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -155.4% | 49.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -231.1% | 33.6% |
| Q4 25 | 21.4% | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.2% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.10× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
