vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Old Dominion (ODFL) and Qnity Electronics, Inc. (Q). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Old Dominion is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.0× Qnity Electronics, Inc.). Old Dominion runs the higher net margin — 17.9% vs 16.5%, a 1.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Qnity Electronics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.1% vs -2.9%).
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL) is an American regional, inter-regional and national less than truckload shipping (LTL) company. In addition to its core LTL services, the company offers expedited, logistics and household moving services.
ODFL vs Q — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $238.3M | $211.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 45.1% |
| Operating Margin | 23.8% | 21.3% |
| Net Margin | 17.9% | 16.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.9% | 11.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -6.4% | 6.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.14 | $1.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $238.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $229.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $270.9M | $211.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $268.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $254.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $263.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $308.6M | $199.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $322.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 47.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.3% | 21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 17.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 16.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.14 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.10 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.28 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.27 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.19 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.43 | $0.95 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.48 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $288.1M | $128.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $40.0M | $1.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.4B | $9.1B |
| Total Assets | $5.7B | $12.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.01× | 0.19× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $288.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $120.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.6M | $128.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $108.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $74.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $104.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | $40.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $20.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $65.0M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $150.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $4.4B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.3B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2B | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $12.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.02× | 0.19× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.04× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.01× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $782.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $568.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 44.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 16.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.71× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $310.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $437.5M | $782.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $285.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $336.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $401.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $446.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $387.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $264.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $343.5M | $568.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $248.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $230.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $203.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $149.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.4% | 44.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 16.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.61× | 3.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.32× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.52× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.45× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.20× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ODFL
Segment breakdown not available.
Q
| Semiconductor Technologies | $693.0M | 54% |
| Interconnect Solutions | $583.0M | 46% |
