vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Osisko Development Corp. (ODV) and High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Osisko Development Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($10.4M vs $6.3M, roughly 1.7× High Roller Technologies, Inc.).
Osisko Development Corp. is a Canada-based mining exploration and development firm focused on high-grade gold and precious metal assets. It holds North American mineral projects, advancing them through exploration, feasibility study, and pre-production phases while adhering to sustainable mining standards.
S&S – Sansei Technologies is an American company known for its pneumatically powered amusement rides and roller coaster designing.
ODV vs ROLR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.4M | $6.3M |
| Net Profit | — | $3.7M |
| Gross Margin | 3.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -149.3% | 1.3% |
| Net Margin | — | 58.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -16.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 831.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.4M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.8M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $22.0M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $4.7M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-592.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-501.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-23.8M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-76.8M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 28.2% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -47.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -149.3% | -6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -124.0% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -241.5% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -1940.8% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -108.2% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -1641.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $6.6M |
| Total Assets | — | $16.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-779.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-78.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-90.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $-78.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-840.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-90.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-845.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -53.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ODV
Segment breakdown not available.
ROLR
| Net Gaming Revenue | $4.9M | 77% |
| Net Revenue Noncore Services | $1.4M | 23% |
