vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Osisko Development Corp. (ODV) and U-BX Technology Ltd. (UBXG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
U-BX Technology Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.4M vs $10.4M, roughly 1.2× Osisko Development Corp.).
Osisko Development Corp. is a Canada-based mining exploration and development firm focused on high-grade gold and precious metal assets. It holds North American mineral projects, advancing them through exploration, feasibility study, and pre-production phases while adhering to sustainable mining standards.
ODV vs UBXG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.4M | $12.4M |
| Net Profit | — | $-3.1M |
| Gross Margin | 3.2% | 0.4% |
| Operating Margin | -149.3% | -22.1% |
| Net Margin | — | -24.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 25 | — | $12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.8M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $22.0M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $4.7M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-23.8M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-76.8M | — |
| Q2 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 28.2% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | -22.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -149.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -124.0% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -241.5% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -1940.8% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | -24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -108.2% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -1641.7% | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $19.0M |
| Total Assets | — | $21.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $19.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q2 25 | — | $21.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-1.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
