vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OGE ENERGY CORP. (OGE) and SIGNET JEWELERS LTD (SIG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SIGNET JEWELERS LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $701.7M, roughly 2.0× OGE ENERGY CORP.). OGE ENERGY CORP. runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs 1.4%, a 8.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SIGNET JEWELERS LTD posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.1% vs -5.8%). OGE ENERGY CORP. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($83.1M vs $-1.5M). Over the past eight quarters, OGE ENERGY CORP.'s revenue compounded faster (9.7% CAGR vs -25.4%).
Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company is a regulated electric utility company that serves over 843,000 customers in Oklahoma and Arkansas, including 1.5 million people in the Oklahoma City Metropolitan Area. It is the leading subsidiary of OGE Energy Corp., with headquarters in downtown Oklahoma City. OGE Energy is also the former parent of Enogex Inc., a natural gas pipeline business which merged with CenterPoint Energy's midstream business to form Enable Midstream in 2013, in 2021 OGE and CenterP...
Signet Jewelers Ltd. is, as of 2015, the world's largest retailer of diamond jewellery. The company is domiciled in Bermuda and headquartered in Akron, Ohio through the Fairlawn suburb, and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The group operates in the middle-market jewellery segment and holds number one positions in the US, Canada, and UK speciality jewellery markets. Certain brands operate in the upper middle market. Signet Jewelers owns and operates the companies Blue Nile, Zales, Kay...
OGE vs SIG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $701.7M | $1.4B |
| Net Profit | $69.2M | $20.0M |
| Gross Margin | 59.2% | 37.3% |
| Operating Margin | 19.7% | 1.7% |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 1.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.8% | 3.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -32.1% | 185.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | $0.49 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $701.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $719.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $741.1M | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $744.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $945.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $582.6M | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $69.2M | $20.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $231.3M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.5M | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.7M | $100.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.9M | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $218.7M | $-98.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $102.3M | $52.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.6M | $626.2M |
| Q4 25 | 59.2% | 37.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 62.2% | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 63.7% | 38.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.3% | 42.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | 36.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.0% | 38.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.9% | 37.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 60.1% | 43.3% |
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.9% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.0% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.5% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.1% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.7% | 16.7% |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.5% | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | 4.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.1% | -6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.2% | 25.1% |
| Q4 25 | $0.34 | $0.49 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.14 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.53 | $0.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | $2.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $0.12 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.09 | $-2.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $-0.90 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.09 | $11.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $200.0K | $234.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $5.0B | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $14.4B | $5.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.08× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $200.0K | $234.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $300.0K | $281.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $500.0K | $264.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.9M | $604.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $600.0K | $157.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.0K | $729.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.3M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4B | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $14.4B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.3B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1B | $5.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0B | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.7B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.5B | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.2B | $6.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.9B | $6.8B |
| Q4 25 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $384.8M | $31.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $83.1M | $-1.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 11.8% | -0.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 43.0% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.56× | 1.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $82.7M | $591.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $384.8M | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $397.8M | $86.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $338.6M | $-175.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | $780.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.6M | $-75.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $347.1M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $253.1M | $-158.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $83.0M | $752.2M |
| Q4 25 | $83.1M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.3M | $62.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.9M | $-211.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-233.6M | $742.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-167.0M | $-138.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $103.0M | $15.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-70.2M | $-181.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-143.9M | $716.1M |
| Q4 25 | 11.8% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | -13.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -31.5% | 31.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.4% | -10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.9% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -24.7% | 28.7% |
| Q4 25 | 43.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.9% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.56× | 1.55× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.15× | -5.23× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.25× | 7.76× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.27× | -10.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.59× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.47× | -3.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.46× | 1.20× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OGE
| Residential | $238.0M | 34% |
| Commercial | $216.6M | 31% |
| Public Authority | $60.7M | 9% |
| Industrial | $59.6M | 8% |
| Oilfield | $56.6M | 8% |
| Transmission | $38.7M | 6% |
| Integrated Market | $20.4M | 3% |
| Other Contractswith Customers | $11.1M | 2% |
SIG
| Other | $571.9M | 41% |
| Zale Jewelry | $243.4M | 17% |
| Extended Service Plan | $129.6M | 9% |
| Diamonds Direct | $87.9M | 6% |
| Blue Nile | $74.3M | 5% |
| Extended Service Plan And Other Deferred Revenue | $69.9M | 5% |
| Banter By Piercing Pagoda | $69.2M | 5% |
| Watches | $48.7M | 3% |
| Peoples | $42.2M | 3% |
| James Allen | $27.8M | 2% |
