vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OGE ENERGY CORP. (OGE) and Tradeweb Markets Inc. (TW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OGE ENERGY CORP. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($752.6M vs $617.8M, roughly 1.2× Tradeweb Markets Inc.). Tradeweb Markets Inc. runs the higher net margin — 37.7% vs 6.7%, a 31.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tradeweb Markets Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.2% vs 0.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Tradeweb Markets Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (23.5% CAGR vs 8.1%).
Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company is a regulated electric utility company that serves over 843,000 customers in Oklahoma and Arkansas, including 1.5 million people in the Oklahoma City Metropolitan Area. It is the leading subsidiary of OGE Energy Corp., with headquarters in downtown Oklahoma City. OGE Energy is also the former parent of Enogex Inc., a natural gas pipeline business which merged with CenterPoint Energy's midstream business to form Enable Midstream in 2013, in 2021 OGE and CenterP...
Tradeweb Markets Inc., headquartered in New York City, operates electronic trading platforms primarily used by institutional investors to trade fixed income products, ETFs, and derivatives. It has over 3,000 customers including banks, asset managers, central banks, pension funds, and insurance companies. In 2024, 83% of the company's revenue was from transaction fees and commissions and 17% was from subscription fees. In 2024, 52% of revenue came from products related to rates, 27% of revenue...
OGE vs TW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $752.6M | $617.8M |
| Net Profit | $50.2M | $233.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 15.0% | 46.5% |
| Net Margin | 6.7% | 37.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.7% | 21.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -19.9% | 38.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.96 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $752.6M | $617.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $701.7M | $521.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $508.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $719.7M | $513.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $741.1M | $509.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $744.7M | $463.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $945.2M | $448.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.1M | $405.0M |
| Q1 26 | $50.2M | $233.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $69.2M | $325.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $231.3M | $185.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.5M | $153.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.7M | $148.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.9M | $142.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $218.7M | $113.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $102.3M | $119.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 59.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 62.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 63.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 15.0% | 46.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | 42.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.2% | 41.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.9% | 39.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.0% | 40.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.5% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.1% | 35.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.3% | 40.1% |
| Q1 26 | 6.7% | 37.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | 62.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.5% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | 29.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.7% | 30.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.1% | 25.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 29.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.96 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.34 | $1.52 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.14 | $0.86 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.53 | $0.71 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | $0.69 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $0.66 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.09 | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $0.55 |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 0.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $384.8M | $355.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $397.8M | $342.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $338.6M | $409.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | $60.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.6M | $282.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $347.1M | $292.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $253.1M | $285.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.1M | $336.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.3M | $328.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.9M | $403.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-233.6M | $58.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-167.0M | $256.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $103.0M | $287.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-70.2M | $280.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.8% | 64.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.4% | 64.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 78.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -31.5% | 11.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.4% | 55.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.9% | 64.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.9% | 69.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.8% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.2% | 1.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.56× | 1.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | 1.84× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.15× | 2.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.25× | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.27× | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.59× | 2.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.47× | 2.40× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OGE
| Residential | $260.4M | 35% |
| Commercial | $212.0M | 28% |
| Public authorities and street light | $61.9M | 8% |
| Industrial | $60.7M | 8% |
| Oilfield | $58.4M | 8% |
| Integrated market | $47.3M | 6% |
| Transmission | $40.7M | 5% |
TW
| Transaction fees and commissions | $523.8M | 85% |
| Subscription fees | $60.3M | 10% |
| LSEG market data fees | $26.7M | 4% |
