vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OGE ENERGY CORP. (OGE) and OLYMPIC STEEL INC (ZEUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OGE ENERGY CORP. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($752.6M vs $490.7M, roughly 1.5× OLYMPIC STEEL INC). OGE ENERGY CORP. runs the higher net margin — 6.7% vs 0.4%, a 6.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OLYMPIC STEEL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.4% vs 0.7%). Over the past eight quarters, OGE ENERGY CORP.'s revenue compounded faster (8.1% CAGR vs 0.1%).
Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company is a regulated electric utility company that serves over 843,000 customers in Oklahoma and Arkansas, including 1.5 million people in the Oklahoma City Metropolitan Area. It is the leading subsidiary of OGE Energy Corp., with headquarters in downtown Oklahoma City. OGE Energy is also the former parent of Enogex Inc., a natural gas pipeline business which merged with CenterPoint Energy's midstream business to form Enable Midstream in 2013, in 2021 OGE and CenterP...
Olympic Steel, Inc. is a metals service center based in Cleveland, Ohio. The company processes and distributes carbon, coated and stainless flat-rolled sheet, coil and plate steel, aluminium alloy, tin plate, and metal-intensive branded products primarily in the United States. Metals processing and value added services include tempering, stretch leveling, cutting-to-length, slitting, edging, shearing, blanking, burning, forming, shot blasting, laser punching, plate rolling, fabricating, machi...
OGE vs ZEUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $752.6M | $490.7M |
| Net Profit | $50.2M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 15.0% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 6.7% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.7% | 4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -19.9% | -21.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $752.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $701.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $490.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $719.7M | $496.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $741.1M | $492.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $744.7M | $418.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $945.2M | $470.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $644.1M | $526.3M |
| Q1 26 | $50.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $69.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $231.3M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.5M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $62.7M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.9M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $218.7M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $102.3M | $7.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 59.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 62.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 63.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 63.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 33.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.3% | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 1.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.34 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.14 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.53 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.50 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.09 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $0.66 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $7.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $240.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $579.1M |
| Total Assets | — | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $200.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $300.0K | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $500.0K | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.9M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $600.0K | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.0K | $9.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $240.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $233.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $235.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $272.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $197.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $209.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.8B | $579.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.6B | $578.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.6B | $574.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6B | $573.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6B | $570.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5B | $569.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.2B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.09× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.37× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-12.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -2.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -2.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $384.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $397.8M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $338.6M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | $49.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $129.6M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $347.1M | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $253.1M | $-2.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $168.3M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.9M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-233.6M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-167.0M | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $103.0M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-70.2M | $-11.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.4% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -31.5% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -10.9% | -2.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 38.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 39.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.2% | 1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.56× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.72× | -2.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.15× | 2.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.25× | 19.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.27× | 3.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.59× | 9.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.47× | -0.38× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OGE
| Residential | $260.4M | 35% |
| Commercial | $212.0M | 28% |
| Public authorities and street light | $61.9M | 8% |
| Industrial | $60.7M | 8% |
| Oilfield | $58.4M | 8% |
| Integrated market | $47.3M | 6% |
| Transmission | $40.7M | 5% |
ZEUS
| Carbon Flat Products | $268.2M | 55% |
| Specialty Metals Flat Products | $140.9M | 29% |
| Tubular And Pipe Products | $81.6M | 17% |
