vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC (OIS) and Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($178.5M vs $143.3M, roughly 1.2× Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc.). Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -31.4% vs -65.7%, a 34.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.4% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC's revenue compounded faster (3.3% CAGR vs 0.0%).
Oil States International, Inc. is an American multinational corporation. It focuses on providing services to oil and gas companies. It is a public company listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
OIS vs PDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $178.5M | $143.3M |
| Net Profit | $-117.2M | $-45.0M |
| Gross Margin | 10.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -63.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -65.7% | -31.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.4% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -873.2% | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.99 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $143.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $178.5M | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $165.2M | $139.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $165.4M | $140.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.9M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.6M | $143.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.3M | $139.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.4M | $143.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-45.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-117.2M | $-43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.3M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $-9.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -63.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -31.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -65.7% | -30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | -9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | -7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | -20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.2% | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | -6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.99 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.05 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.24 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.23 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $69.9M | $2.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $573.2M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $883.4M | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $69.9M | $731.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.1M | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.9M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.8M | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.4M | $109.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.0M | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2M | $138.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.7M | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $124.7M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $124.6M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $124.3M | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $573.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $689.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $690.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $683.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $680.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $684.8M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $690.4M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $883.4M | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $993.7M | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $990.7M | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $994.1M | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.18× | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.18× | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.18× | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.18× | 1.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $50.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $47.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | 110.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $73.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $50.1M | $140.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | $50.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.2M | $198.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.8M | $42.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $66.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $137.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 110.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.15× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.33× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.94× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.20× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.87× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OIS
| Project Driven | $112.6M | 63% |
| Downhole Technologies | $32.1M | 18% |
| Completion And Production Services | $23.1M | 13% |
| Military And Other Products | $10.7M | 6% |
PDM
Segment breakdown not available.
