vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC (OIS) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.5M vs $178.5M, roughly 1.1× OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC). ROGERS CORP runs the higher net margin — 2.2% vs -65.7%, a 67.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.4% vs 5.2%). OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($47.1M vs $1.1M). Over the past eight quarters, OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC's revenue compounded faster (3.3% CAGR vs -3.3%).
Oil States International, Inc. is an American multinational corporation. It focuses on providing services to oil and gas companies. It is a public company listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
OIS vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $178.5M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $-117.2M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | 10.9% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | -63.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -65.7% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.4% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -873.2% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.99 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $178.5M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $165.2M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $165.4M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.9M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.6M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $174.3M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.4M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-117.2M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.2M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.3M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.1% | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.2% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 23.3% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.7% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.7% | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.8% | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -63.7% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -65.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.2% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.2% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.7% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.99 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.03 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.05 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.05 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.24 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.23 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $69.9M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $573.2M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $883.4M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $69.9M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.1M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $53.9M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $66.8M | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.4M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.0M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.2M | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $124.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $124.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $124.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $124.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $573.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $689.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $690.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $683.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $680.7M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $684.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $690.4M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $883.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $993.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $990.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $994.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.18× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $50.1M | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $47.1M | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.4% | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $73.9M | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $50.1M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.7M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.0M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.2M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.8M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.1M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.0M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.7M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $137.0K | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.0M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $21.4M | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5M | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.4% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.3% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.7% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.6% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.15× | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.33× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.94× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.20× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.87× | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OIS
| Project Driven | $112.6M | 63% |
| Downhole Technologies | $32.1M | 18% |
| Completion And Production Services | $23.1M | 13% |
| Military And Other Products | $10.7M | 6% |
ROG
Segment breakdown not available.
