vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Okta, Inc. (OKTA) and Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Okta, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($742.0M vs $260.5M, roughly 2.8× Tenable Holdings, Inc.). Okta, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs -0.3%, a 6.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Okta, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.6% vs 10.5%). Okta, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($214.0M vs $82.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Okta, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (10.7% CAGR vs 9.8%).
Okta, Inc. is an American identity and access management company based in San Francisco. It provides cloud software that helps companies manage and secure user authentication into applications, and for developers to build identity controls into applications, websites, web services, and devices. It was founded in 2009 and had its initial public offering in 2017, reaching a valuation of over $6 billion.
Tenable Holdings, Inc. is a cybersecurity company based in Columbia, Maryland. Its vulnerability scanner software Nessus, developed in 1998, is one of the most widely deployed vulnerability assessment solutions in the cybersecurity industry. As of December 31, 2023, the company had approximately 44,000 customers, including 65% of the Fortune 500.
OKTA vs TENB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $742.0M | $260.5M |
| Net Profit | $43.0M | $-737.0K |
| Gross Margin | 77.1% | 78.8% |
| Operating Margin | 3.1% | 3.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.8% | -0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.6% | 10.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 168.8% | -139.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.24 | $-0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $742.0M | $260.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $728.0M | $252.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $688.0M | $247.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $682.0M | $239.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $665.0M | $235.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $646.0M | $227.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $617.0M | $221.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $605.0M | $216.0M |
| Q4 25 | $43.0M | $-737.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.0M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.0M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.0M | $-22.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.0M | $1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.0M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-40.0M | $-14.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-44.0M | $-14.4M |
| Q4 25 | 77.1% | 78.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 76.9% | 77.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 77.5% | 78.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 76.8% | 78.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 76.4% | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 76.0% | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 76.0% | 77.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 76.0% | 77.3% |
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.6% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.7% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | -7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.4% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.9% | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.6% | -4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.7% | -4.1% |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.0% | -5.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.5% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6.5% | -6.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.3% | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.24 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.37 | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.35 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.15 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.00 | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.15 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.24 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.26 | $-0.12 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.5B | $402.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $326.4M |
| Total Assets | $9.2B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $402.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $383.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7B | $386.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $460.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $577.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $548.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $487.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $510.8M |
| Q4 25 | $6.9B | $326.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.8B | $344.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6B | $350.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.4B | $383.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.3B | $400.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1B | $404.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0B | $363.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.9B | $358.9M |
| Q4 25 | $9.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.0B | $1.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $218.0M | $83.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $214.0M | $82.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 28.8% | 31.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.5% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.07× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $904.0M | $254.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $218.0M | $83.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $167.0M | $53.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $241.0M | $42.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $286.0M | $87.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $159.0M | $81.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $86.0M | $54.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $219.0M | $31.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $174.0M | $50.3M |
| Q4 25 | $214.0M | $82.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $165.0M | $53.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $240.0M | $38.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $285.0M | $80.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $158.0M | $78.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $81.0M | $53.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $218.0M | $30.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.0M | $49.7M |
| Q4 25 | 28.8% | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.9% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 41.8% | 33.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.8% | 33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.5% | 23.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 35.3% | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.3% | 23.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.1% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.2% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | 5.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.49× | 23.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.89× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.43× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.94× | 43.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.97× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
OKTA
| Subscription And Circulation | $724.0M | 98% |
| Technology Service | $18.0M | 2% |
TENB
| Subscription And Circulation | $238.9M | 92% |
| Other | $11.0M | 4% |
| License And Maintenance | $10.6M | 4% |
